Canton Coup

The Canton Coup[1] of 20 March 1926, also known as the Zhongshan Incident[2] or the March 20th Incident,[3] was a purge of Communist elements of the Nationalist army in Guangzhou (then romanized as "Canton") undertaken by Chiang Kai-shek. The incident solidified Chiang's power immediately before the successful Northern Expedition, turning him into the paramount leader of the country.

Canton Coup
The Zhongshan under steam.
Zhongshan Incident
Traditional Chinese中山艦事件
Simplified Chinese中山舰事件
Literal meaningZhongshan Warship Incident
March 20th Incident
Chinese三二〇事件
Literal meaning3/20 Incident
Chiang Kai-shek leading the Northern Expedition in 1926.
A model of the Zhongshan.
The Zhongshan Warship Museum in Wuhan.
The restored warship.

History

Background

At the time of the incident, the Nationalist and Communist parties of China were working together as part of the First United Front, allied against the local warlords who were carving the country into fiefdoms. The Soviet Union was working with both groups and notably bankrolling Guangzhou's Whampoa Military Academy. It had assisted Sun Yat-sen in regaining control of Guangdong; after his death from cancer in 1925, the Nationalists began a protracted leadership struggle that included interprovincial war. The assassination of Liao Zhongkai led to Hu Hanmin's ouster and the promotion of Chiang Kai-shek, then commandant of the military academy, to commander of the National Revolutionary Army. There were plans for a northern offensive against the warlords, but leadership remained divided—principally between the right-wing Chiang and the left-wing Wang Jingwei. With support from the Soviets and the Communists, the left wing looked ascendant: Hu had said the Nationalists' ultimate goal was socialism and the January 1926 party conference had placed Communists in strategic posts and the party apparently "almost wholly under leftist control".[2]

Incident
Guangzhou ("Canton") in the 1920s.

The coastal defense ship SS Yongfeng had been renamed the SS Zhongshan (romanized at the time as Chung Shan) in honor of Sun Yat-sen[n 1] following his death. It was the most powerful ship in the Nationalist navy.[3] Its captain, Li Zhilong, was a Communist, working with a Soviet naval advisor.[1] They had moved his warship to Guangzhou to support uprisings in the area, alarming the Nationalists.[1] On the night of 18/19 March it suddenly relocated from Guangzhou to anchorage off Changzhou ("Dane's Island").[3] It then sailed back the next day.[4]

In his subsequent reports, Chiang stated that he became alarmed when the ship's commander claimed to be acting on orders from him, which he had never given.[5] His suspicions were further increased by numerous odd phone calls. Chen Jieru reported that Wang's wife Chen Bijun had called her five times on the 18th to check Chiang's schedule. Xu Zhen reported repeated calls by Deng Yanda, Whampoa's political director, inquiring when Chiang would next ride to Changzhou; upon Chiang telling him it wouldn't be soon, Li Zhilong called him to report Deng's order to depart. Li Dongfang stated that Chiang never explained who had made the repeated calls but thought it to have been Wang Jingwei.[6] In reaction, Chiang purchased a ticket on a Japanese steamer to Shantou but ultimately decided to fight rather than run.[5] Andrei Bubnov, head of the Soviet mission in Guangzhou, noted in his reports that the incident was due to an abortive putsch mistakenly pursued by some of the Communist commanders in the Nationalist army.[7]

On 20 March 1926 Chiang declared martial law[5] and cut off Guangzhou's phone network.[6] He used Nationalist troops and cadets from the Whampoa Military Academy (where he was commandant) to arrest its Communist political commissars.[1] Chen Zhaoying, Chen Ce and Ouyang Ge arrested Li Zhilong in his bedroom at dawn and secured the warship, with Jiang Dingwen taking Li's place at the Navy Bureau. Wu Tiecheng and Hui Dongsheng surrounded the residences of Wang Jingwei and the Soviet advisors, effectively placing them under house arrest. Deng Yanda was arrested. Hui also surrounded the Guangzhou–Hong Kong Strike Committee. Liu Zhi arrested Communists in the 2nd Division and those at Whampoa or in the 1st Corps—including Zhou Enlai—were arrested and later expelled following "Three Principles" orientation. Two garrisons were removed.[6] Chiang's men also disarmed the Communists' paramilitary Workers' Guard.[1] Gen. Victor Rogacheff, the head of the Soviet military mission at Guangzhou, fled to Beijing but Vasily Blyukher, the military consultant to the Nationalists, and Mikhail Borodin, the political consultant helping to remake the KMT into a Leninist organization, were both arrested;[1] Borodin's assistant Kassanga (pseudonym of Nikolay Kuibyshev) was expelled on the 24th.[6]

Wang Jingwei, who had a high fever at the time, was visited by Chen Gongbo; Tan Yankai, head of the 2nd Corps; Zhu Peide (3rd Corps); Li Jishen (4th Corps); and T. V. Soong, the minister of finance. Wang was indignant and some of the others felt Chiang was overreacting, but the Nationalist Executive Committee convened at the house on 22 March and a compromise was reached in which Wang would take a vacation abroad in the near future.[8]

Aftermath

The Canton Coup effectively ended the efforts of the Chinese Communists and Soviets to undermine the Nationalists through steady work to strengthen the party's left wing at the expense of its right.[9] As the Soviets were anxious to maintain their influence and Chiang had need of their help in the upcoming Northern Expedition, however, he and A.S. Bubnov negotiated a new accord. The Soviets would maintain some advisors and provide support but recall Kuibishev, provide a list of Communist members in the KMT and accept that Communists would no longer hold top cabinet positions. On 3 April a public telegram from Chiang stated that the affair was a "limited and individual matter" of "a small number of members of our Party who had carried out an anti-revolutionary plot".[5] He removed some right-wingers from leadership,[10] including Wu Tiecheng, and criticized the Western Hills Group.[8] He also forbade right-wing demonstrations and never publicly questioned the United Front.[11] Trotsky in Russia and the central committees of the Communist parties in Shanghai and Guangdong all opposed the arrangement with Chiang, but Stalin backed it.[12] On May 15 the Nationalists required the Communists "not to entertain any doubt on or criticize Dr Sun or his principles"; to provide lists of their members within the Nationalist Party; to not exceed one-third of the membership of any municipal, provincial or central party committee; and not to serve as the head of any government department or party.[12] The same session formalized Chiang's leadership of the party and army, ending civilian oversight of the Nationalist military. "Emergency decrees" soon expanded Chiang's power for the duration of the Northern Expedition, although his direct control of the military remained partial[12] owing to its regional composition and divided loyalties.

On 7 April Wang Jingwei resigned his posts and announced he would travel abroad;[11] he left for France secretly on May 11.[12] Bubnov was recalled to Russia the same month.[13] Wang finally returned in April of the next year, invited by Borodin to counter Chiang's success.[8] Zhou Enlai, removed from his posts in Guangzhou, travelled to Shanghai, where he organized strikes by hundreds of thousands of factory workers in February and March 1927.[14]

Controversy

The Communists denied that there was any plot against Chiang and that his actions were simply intended to remove the left-wing Wang Jingwei from influence over the army and Guangzhou's important military academy.[1] Historians disagree on whether the incident was plotted by Chiang Kai-shek,[6][n 2] was a Communist plot to kidnap him and remove him to Vladivostok,[6] or whether the whole affair was merely "a series of miscommunications, misunderstandings, faulty telephone connections and personal rivalries among junior staff".[4]

gollark: This part of the program is particularly great.
gollark: Well, my code is generally kind of unpleasant, but this particular bit is fine.
gollark: This is "Rust" "code". It has a perfectly reasonable amount of symbols.
gollark: It also doesn't have generics, so I can't make a smart pointer which works for any type without `void*`, which is type-unsafe.
gollark: If I make my own smart pointers, then I'm pretty sure I have to manually sprinkle my code with macrons/function calls to do things to them, because the macros are bad token substitution things and not powerful enough to add them appropriately.

See also

Notes
  1. Among Sun's many names, "Zhongshan" is the most popular within China.
  2. Zhang Qianwu has gone so far as questioning whether Li was even the captain of the Zhongshan, arguing from surviving records that Li's "orders" were forgeries and the actual commander was Zhang Chentong.[15]

References

Citations
  1. Wortzel (1999), "Canton Coup".
  2. Felber (2002), p. 57.
  3. Van de Ven (2003), p. 101.
  4. Van de Ven (2003), p. 102.
  5. Van de Ven (2003), p. 103.
  6. Ah Xiang (1998), p. 1.
  7. Felber (2002), p. 58.
  8. Ah Xiang (1998), p. 2.
  9. Leutner (2006), p. 49.
  10. Felber (2002), p. 60.
  11. Van de Ven (2003), p. 104.
  12. Ah Xiang (1998), p. 3.
  13. BDC (1986), "Andrei Bubnov".
  14. Ah Xiang (1998), p. 4.
  15. Zhang (2005).

Sources
  • Biographical Dictionary of the Comintern, Hoover Publication No. 340, Stanford: Hoover Institution Press, 1986.
  • Ah Xiang (1998), "The Zhongshan Warship Incident" (PDF), Tragedy of Chinese Revolution.
  • Felber, Roland (2002), "A 'Bloc Within' or a 'Bloc Without'? Controversies on the CCP's attitude towards the Guomindang before and after 20 March 1926", The Chinese Revolution in the 1920s: Between Triumph and Disaster, London: RoutledgeCurzon, pp. 52–65.
  • Leutner, Mechthild, "The Communist Party of China and the Communist Party of the Soviet Union and the Comintern in the 1920s and Early 1930s: Interactions between Cooperation and Defense", Global Conjectures: China in Transnational Perspective, Chinese History and Society, Vol. 30, Berlin: Lit, pp. 41–55.
  • Wortzel, Larry M. (1999), Dictionary of Contemporary Chinese Military History, Westport: Greenwood Press.
  • Van de Ven, Hans (2003), War and Nationalism in China: 1925–1945, Studies in the Modern History of Asia, London: RoutledgeCurzon, ISBN 978-0415145718.
  • Zhang Qian-wu (February 2005), "The Truth of the Event of the Warship 'Zhongshan'", Journal of Xidian University, Social Sciences ed.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.