Boyce v Boyce

Boyce v Boyce (1849) 60 ER 959 is an English trusts law case, concerning the certainty of subject matter. Its outcome may have become outdated by the more recent judgments in In re Roberts[1] and Re Golay's Will Trusts.[2]

Boyce v Boyce
CourtCourt of Chancery
Citation(s)(1849) 60 ER 959, (1849) 16 Sim 476
Keywords
Trusts

Facts

The testator left four houses on trust for his daughters, under the condition that his daughter Maria would choose the one she wanted, and the remaining three would then go to his other daughter Charlotte. Maria died before her father, and it was unknown which house she would have chosen.[3]

Judgment

In the Court of Chancery, the Vice Chancellor, held the trust failed because it was uncertain which house Maria would have chosen, and which would go to Charlotte.

gollark: Exactly.
gollark: Don't bother expanding. Just build underground. WHAT COULD GO WRONG?!
gollark: Yes, more keansing may be necesesasaryar.
gollark: Oh, Keanu! How's Keansia been Keansing?
gollark: <@317862698320920578> discord announcement

See also

Notes
  1. (1881-82) LR 19 Ch D 520
  2. [1965] 1 WLR 969
  3. Oosterhoff on Trusts : text, commentary and materials 8th edition, Carswell, 2014, pp 216

References
      This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.