Blechnaceae

Blechnaceae is a family of ferns in the order Polypodiales, with a cosmopolitan distribution. Its status as a family and the number of genera included have both varied considerably. In the Pteridophyte Phylogeny Group classification of 2016 (PPG I), the family has 24 genera, and excludes genera placed in the separate family Onocleaceae.[1] Alternatively, it may be treated as the subfamily Blechnoideae s.l. of a very broadly defined family Aspleniaceae, and include genera others place in Onocleaceae.[2]

Blechnaceae
Blechnum spicant
Scientific classification
Kingdom: Plantae
Clade: Tracheophytes
Class: Polypodiopsida
Order: Polypodiales
Suborder: Aspleniineae
Family: Blechnaceae
Newman[1]
Type genus
Blechnum
Subfamilies and genera

See text.

Synonyms[2]
  • Blechnoideae Hook.

Description

Most are ground dwelling, some are climbers, such as Stenochlaena. A characteristic feature of many species is that the young opening fronds are usually tinged with red.

Taxonomy

The family was created by Newman in 1844. In 2014, Christenhusz and Chase submerged it as subfamily Blechnoideae within the family Aspleniaceae and included Onocleaceae in it.[2] The PPG I classification of 2016 restored it to family status.[1]

Blechnaceae is a member of the eupolypods II clade (now the suborder Aspleniineae), in the order Polypodiales.[3] It is related to other families in the clade as in the following cladogram:[4][3]

Aspleniineae (eupolypods II)
 

Cystopteridaceae

 
 
 
 

Rhachidosoraceae

 
 
 

Diplaziopsidaceae

 
 
 

Aspleniaceae

 
 

Hemidictyaceae

 
 
 
 
 
 

Thelypteridaceae

 
 
 

Woodsiaceae

 
 
 
 

Onocleaceae

 
 

Blechnaceae

 
 
 

Athyriaceae

 
 
 
 
 
 

Subdivisions

The number of genera accepted within Blechnaceae (or Blechnoideae when treated as a subfamily) has varied between authors. Christenhusz and Chase (2014), treating the group as a subfamily, describe the situation as follows: "Blechnoideae comprise three major clades, one corresponding to Onoclea sensu lato, a second corresponding to Woodwardia, sister to all other species that can be treated as the single genus Blechnum. However, the subclade sister to the rest of Blechnum sensu lato contains the vining taxa Stenochlaena, Salpichlaena J.Sm. and a few non-vining Blechnum species with long-creeping rhizomes, which may have to be accepted at the generic level pending further studies. Brainea, Doodia, Pteridoblechnum and Sadleria belong to Blechnum sensu lato."[2]

Perrie et al. (2014) retained the family rank and excluded Onoclea as a separate family, Onocleaceae, sister to Blechnaceae. They identified three major clades within the remaining Blechnaceae, which they labelled Woodwardia, super-Stenochlaena and super-Blechnum, with the latter two as sister groups. They did not consider Blechnum as monophyletic and recommended revision of intergeneric boundaries, resulting in seven genera.[5]

Gasper et al. (2016), independently of Christenhusz and Chase, examined the deeper relationships of the Blechnaceae, retaining its family status and excluding Onocleaceae, and allocated the three major clades of Perrie et al. (2014) to subfamilies: Woodwardioideae, Stenochlaenoideae and Blechnoideae. Their approach to the polyphyletic nature of Blechnum was to create a series of monophyletic segregate genera, resulting in 24 genera in total.[6][7] The relationship between the three subfamilies was found to be as follows:[6]

Blechnaceae
 

Woodwardioideae

 
 
 

Stenochlaenoideae

 
 

Blechnoideae

 
 
 

Subfamilies and genera

In 2016, the Pteridophyte Phylogeny Group followed Gasper et al. (2016) in accepting 24 genera, grouped into three subfamilies with approximately 265 species, most of which are placed in the subfamily Blechnoideae.[1]

Subfamily Woodwardioideae Gasper, V.A.O.Dittrich & Salino

Subfamily Stenochlaenoideae (Ching) J.P.Roux

Subfamily Blechnoideae Gasper, V.A.O.Dittrich & Salino

gollark: WHY WOULD YOU USE "ETHERIC DIGI BEEHIVES".
gollark: How would that happen? Our stuff just prints new components whenever it runs out of anything.
gollark: You're just stuck on outdated tech, like *physical beehives*.
gollark: Well, the newer direct matter substrate ones.
gollark: They can just print upgrades/maintenance into themselves directly.

References
  1. PPG I 2016.
  2. Christenhusz & Chase 2014.
  3. Carl J. Rothfels; Anders Larsson; Li-Yaung Kuo; Petra Korall; Wen- Liang Chiou; Kathleen M. Pryer (2012). "Overcoming Deep Roots, Fast Rates, and Short Internodes to Resolve the Ancient Rapid Radiation of Eupolypod II Ferns". Systematic Biology. 61 (1): 490–509. doi:10.1093/sysbio/sys001. PMID 22223449.
  4. Samuli Lehtonen (2011). Steinke, Dirk (ed.). "Towards Resolving the Complete Fern Tree of Life" (PDF). PLoS ONE. 6 (10): e24851. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0024851. PMC 3192703. PMID 22022365.
  5. Perrie et al. 2014.
  6. Gasper et al. 2016a.
  7. Gasper et al. 2016b.

Bibliography
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.