Berne Convention Implementation Act of 1988

The Berne Convention Implementation Act of 1988 is a copyright act that came into force in the United States on March 1, 1989, making it a party to the Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works.

Context

The United States initially refused—for 102 years, from 1886 to 1988—to join the Berne Convention, as it would have required major changes in its copyright law, particularly:

(A) Moral rights,
(B) Copyright formalities, including registration, deposit, and mandatory copyright notice

At the same time, U.S. copyright experts seemed to acknowledge that the United States' approach to international copyright relations was flawed. For example, Barbara Ringer, a leading U.S. copyright official, remarked that until around 1955, the United States' "role in international copyright was marked by short-sightedness, political isolationism, and narrow economic self-interest".[1]

The Pirate Publisher—An International Burlesque that has the Longest Run on Record, from Puck, 1886, satirizes the ability of publishers to take works from one country and publish them in another without paying the original authors.

H. Sandison writes: "The roots of American isolationism [are from the 1790 Copyright Act which protected books] only if their authors were citizens or residents of the United States".[2] Ringer observed that this meant U.S. publishers could pirate the works of English authors like Charles Dickens and publish them cheaper in the new nation than U.S. authors could be published.[3] This hurt the market for American books for 100 years and was only partly remedied in 1891, when the United States passed a limited international copyright law.[4] Although the United States was not alone in denying copyright protection to nonresident foreigners, by waiting until 1988 to join the Berne Convention, the United States was one of the last industrial countries to join.

By ratifying the Berne Convention, the United States Congress signaled that it was taking a "minimalist approach to compliance" (emphasis original).[5] Indeed, regarding both moral rights and formalities, the Implementation Act was limited; in short, the "major concession was that the United States finally, reluctantly, did away with copyright formalities".[6] Furthermore, some copyright formalities, like requiring that a copy of the work be "deposited" at the Library of Congress, were preserved.[5]

gollark: [EXPUNGE]
gollark: Your soul is being bridged to APIONET. Do not resist.
gollark: Idea: no.
gollark: $$e^{i\pi}-1=0$$
gollark: Bow down to my TeX $$skillz$$.

See also

References
  1. Barbara Ringer, The Role of the United States in International Copyright -- Past, Present, and Future, 56 Georgetown Law Journal, 1050, 1051 (1968).
  2. H. or R. Sandison, The Berne Convention and the Universal Copyright Convention: The American Experience, 11 Colum.-V.LA. J. L. & Arts, 89, 90-95 (1986).
  3. Barbara Ringer, 200 Years of American Copyright Law in the ABA's "200 Years of American Copyright Law," in Am. Bar Assn, "Two Hundred Years of English and American Patent, Trademark and Copyright Law," 117-129 (1977.)
  4. Robert Gorman & Jane Ginsburg, Copyright: Cases and Materials, 843-851, 1999, Lexis Law, Charlottesville, Va.
  5. Margreth Brewer, Intellectual Property Emanuel Law Outline, Aspen Publishers, NY, 2008, p. 196
  6. Edward Samuels, The Illustrated Story of Copyright, Thomas Dunne Publ., NY, 2000, pp. 232-242
  • Jane Ginsburg and Robert Kernochan, "One Hundred and Two Years Later: the US joins the Berne Convention," 13 Col. VLA J. Law and the Arts (1988)
  • Koenigsberg, I. Fred. 1991. "United States copyright after Berne - the most significant catalyst in 100 years." LOGOS: The Journal of the World Book Community 2, no. 2: 68-72.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.