Bayport Terminal

The Bayport Container Terminal, or simply the Bayport Terminal, is a major deep water port in the Greater Houston area in Texas (United States). This relatively new terminal, part of the Port of Houston, is designed to handle standardized cargo containers and offload the nearby Barbours Cut Terminal, which has no further room for expansion.[2] The Bayport Terminal is situated along the Bayport Ship Channel off Galveston Bay, between La Porte, Texas and Seabrook, Texas (adjacent to Shoreacres and El Jardin). This channel itself feeds into the larger Houston Ship Channel, which runs from Houston, through Galveston Bay, to the Gulf of Mexico.

Bayport Container Terminal
Location
CountryUnited States
LocationPasadena, Texas[1]
Coordinates29°36′40″N 95°0′40″W
Details
Opened2007
Operated byPort of Houston Authority
Owned byCity of Houston
Type of harborNatural / artificial
Statistics
Website
http://www.portofhouston.com

The port sits adjacent to the Bayport Industrial District, a large complex of firms primarily involved in petroleum and petrochemical processing.

The facilities at Bayport formerly included a cruise ship terminal, built at a cost of US$81 million.[3] The terminal briefly saw use for cruises following Hurricane Ike when ships like Carnival Cruise Lines Ecstasy and Conquest were re-routed from the damaged Port of Galveston to Bayport for nearly two months. Bayport Cruise Terminal was a planned port of call for both Princess Cruises and Norwegian Cruise Line in 2013-2014.[4] The cruise ships have since abandoned the terminal and the Port of Houston has dismantled the gangways.[5]

Controversy

The Bayport Terminal was controversial since before its construction because of concerns raised about environmental impact and the general suitability of the site.[6] The United States Army Corps of Engineers approved the permit, but stated in the Environmental Impact Statement that unavoidable impacts of increased noise in the area, increased levels of nitrous oxides, sulfur dioxide, carbon dioxide, and cancer causing particulate matter would be emitted by the terminal. Homes are within 600 feet (180 m) of the docks.[7] Due to the prevailing southeast wind and the proximity of the residents, the Corps of Engineers recommended a 30-foot (9.1 m) sound wall to block sound levels that they estimated to be as high as 70 dBA (as of 2010 the terminal was only approximately 30% in operation yet produced levels of 65 dBA).[8][9] The Port of Houston approached residents who are affected by the pollution and noise and has attempted to buy an easement from these residents. In 2010, the mayor of Shoreacres published a letter to the community raising concerns about the scope of the easement and rights residents might be waiving by accepting it.[9][10] That same year residents of Shoreacres filed suit against the Port of Houston Authority for damages.[11][12]

gollark: Wrong. It isn't the issue.
gollark: People assume quantum computers are magic do-anything boxes, that regular computers "can't be random", that AI is "incapable of creativity" or might randomly become "conscious"/"sentient"/humanlike and rebel, etc.
gollark: Perhaps people just don't actually care much about accurate beliefs in subjects they don't personally use much, and vaguely assume that whatever they know about those things is right enough to discuss politics and whatever.
gollark: There are, I imagine, a lot of issues in other fields I don't know as much about.
gollark: Quantum computing, anything about computers, a decent amount of physics, AI.

See also

Notes
  1. "Bayport Terminal". Port of Houston Authority. Archived from the original on 3 February 2010. Retrieved 22 Jan 2010.
  2. "Bayport Terminal Progress". Port of Houston Authority. Archived from the original on 2010-02-16. Retrieved 1 Feb 2010.
  3. Connelly, Richard (September 16, 2008). "Hurricane Ike An Ike Miracle: Bayport Cruise Terminal To Actually Be Used". Houston Press.
  4. http://globenewswire.com/news-release/2012/11/15/505636/10012824/en/Photo-Release-Princess-and-Norwegian-Cruising-Into-Port-of-Houston.html
  5. http://www.houstonchronicle.com/business/article/With-cruise-ships-gone-Port-of-Houston-decides-8425454.php
  6. "$1.2-B Houston Port Expansion Plan Still Knee-Deep in Debate". Interactive Publishing. May 2003.
  7. Corps of Engineers (May 2003). Final Environmental Impact Statement (PDF). sections 3.0 and 4.0. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2009-06-21. Retrieved 2010-05-05.
  8. Corps of Engineers (May 2003). Final Environmental Impact Statement (PDF). sections 3.8-31-3.8-32. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2009-06-21. Retrieved 2010-05-05.
  9. "Bayport Mitigation". Port of Houston Authority. Archived from the original on 2010-05-27. Retrieved Mar 2010. Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)
  10. "Mayor Responds to Port Easement Proposal". City of Shoreacres. March 2010.
  11. "Bayport Terminal". Moriarty Leyendecker. Retrieved Mar 2010. Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)
  12. Reece, Kevin (March 26, 2010). "Shoreacres residents turn to lawsuit over industrial noise". KHOU. Archived from the original on 2010-03-28.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.