Asian Netball Championships
The Asian Netball Championship is a netball competition held every two years with teams from across Asia competing. First 7 editions were held every four years, then changed to every two years starting from 2012. Sri lanka is the reigning champion of the tournament and also the most successful team, having won the Asian Netball Championships 5 times. Singapore has 3 championships and Malaysia has two. From the first edition of the tournament held in 1985, Sri Lanka, Singapore and Malaysia dominated the tournament by always finishing within the top three. Only exception is the 3rd edition of the tournament held in 1993 where host nation Hong kong managed to win the championship.
Current season, competition or edition: | |
Sport | Netball |
---|---|
Inaugural season | 1985 |
No. of teams | 12 (2018) |
Most recent champion(s) | |
Most titles |
Results
Year | 1st | 2nd | 3rd | Venue | Number of teams |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1985 | Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia | 5 | |||
1989 | New Delhi, India | 4 | |||
1993 | Hong Kong | 5 | |||
1997 | Singapore | 5 | |||
2001 | Colombo, Sri Lanka | 8 | |||
2005 | Toa Payoh Sports Hall, Singapore | 7 | |||
2009 | Juara Stadium, Bukit Kiara, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia | 9 [1] | |||
2012 | Sugathadasa Indoor Stadium, Colombo, Sri Lanka | 10[2] | |||
2014 | Singapore Sports Hub OCBC Arena, Singapore | 10[3] | |||
2016 | Thailand | 9 | |||
2018 | Singapore Sports Hub OCBC Arena, Singapore | 12 |
Participating nations
Team | 1985 |
1989 |
1993 |
1997 |
2001 |
2005 |
2009 |
2012 |
2014 |
2016 |
2018 |
Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | 6th | 7th | 6th | 8th | 4 | |
- | - | - | - | - | - | 6th | - | 5th | 7th | 12th | 4 | |
4th | - | 1st | - | 5th | 5th | 5th | 4th | 4th | 4th | 4th | 9 | |
5th | 4th | 5th | 4th | 6th | 7th | 7th | 5th | 6th | - | 6th | 10 | |
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | 8th | 8th | 8th | 5th | 4 | |
1st | 3rd | 4th | 2nd | 3rd | 2nd | 3rd | 3rd | 3rd | 1st | 3rd | 11 | |
- | - | 5th | 7th | 5th | 8th | 7th | - | 9th | 10th | 7 | ||
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 9th | - | - | 1 | |
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | 9th | - | - | - | 1 | |
- | - | - | - | 8th | - | 9th | 10th | - | - | 11th | 4 | |
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 9th | 1 | |
3rd | 2nd | 2nd | 3rd | 2nd | 1st | 2nd | 1st | 1st | 3rd | 2nd | 11 | |
2nd | 1st | 3rd | 1st | 1st | 3rd | 1st | 2nd | 2nd | 2nd | 1st | 11 | |
- | - | - | - | 4th | 4th | 4th | - | - | 5th | 7th | 5 | |
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 10th | - | - | 1 |
gollark: There are probably some things where you need the most CPU power per server - big database servers which aren't horizontally scaleable, video encoding, whatever - but I don't think that's the majority of use.
gollark: IIRC lots are already having issues with the high power of recent server CPU generations.
gollark: Most customers want to maximize compute per *rack*, not per server.
gollark: I can't see this actually being very useful outside of weirdly specific scenarios, honestly.
gollark: It's only 50% more cores than previously. And the chiplet-y design is meant to make it easy to shove extra cores on if you don't care about power much.
See also
References
- "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 27 July 2011. Retrieved 3 April 2009.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
- Official Website Archived 27 August 2012 at the Wayback Machine
- "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 14 September 2014. Retrieved 14 September 2014.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.