Asarums IF

Asarums IF FK is a Swedish football club located in Asarum, Karlshamn Municipality.[2]

Asarums IF FK
Full nameAsarums Idrottsförening Fotbollklubb
Founded1954
GroundAsarums IP
Asarum
Sweden
ChairmanThomas Lilja
Head CoachPaul Scott[1]
LeagueDivision 2 Östra Götaland
2019Division 2 Östra Götaland, 7th

Background

Asarums IF FK currently plays in Division 4 Blekinge which is the sixth tier of Swedish football.[3] They play their home matches at the Asarums IP in Asarum.[4]

The club is affiliated to Blekinge Fotbollförbund.[5] Asarums IF have competed in the Svenska Cupen on 17 occasions.[6]

Season to season

Season Level Division Section Position Movements
1993 Tier 4 Division 3 Sydöstra Götaland 12th Relegated
1994 Tier 5 Division 4 Blekinge 4th
1995 Tier 5 Division 4 Blekinge 9th
1996 Tier 5 Division 4 Blekinge 13th Relegated
1997 Tier 6 Division 5 Blekinge Promoted
1998 Tier 5 Division 4 Blekinge 6th
1999 Tier 5 Division 4 Blekinge 9th
2000 Tier 5 Division 4 Blekinge 4th
2001 Tier 5 Division 4 Blekinge 8th
2002 Tier 5 Division 4 Blekinge 2nd Promotion Playoffs
2003 Tier 5 Division 4 Blekinge 3rd
2004 Tier 5 Division 4 Blekinge 6th
2005 Tier 5 Division 4 Blekinge 5th
2006* Tier 6 Division 4 Blekinge 9th
2007 Tier 6 Division 4 Blekinge 6th
2008 Tier 6 Division 4 Blekinge 2nd
2009 Tier 6 Division 4 Blekinge 2nd
2010 Tier 6 Division 4 Blekinge 2nd Promotion Playoffs
2011 Tier 6 Division 4 Blekinge 2nd Promotion
2012 Tier 5 Division 3 Sydöstra Götaland 5th
2013 Tier 5 Division 3 Sydöstra Götaland 1st Promotion

* League restructuring in 2006 resulted in a new division being created at Tier 3 and subsequent divisions dropping a level. [7] [8] [9]

Footnotes

gollark: I thought about that, but:- strings in a binary format will be about the same length- integers will have some space saving, but I don't think it's very significant- it would, in a custom one, be harder to represent complex objects and stuff, which some extensions may be use- you could get some savings by removing strings like "title" which XTMF repeats a lot, but at the cost of it no longer being self-describing, making extensions harder and making debugging more annoying- I am not convinced that metadata size is a significant issue
gollark: I mean, "XTMF with CBOR/msgpack and compression" was being considered as a hypothetical "XTMF2", but I'd definitely want something, well, self-describing.
gollark: Also also, why a binary format?
gollark: Also, XTMF can do runtime update, you just need to allocate, say, 4KB at the start of the tape, and write metadata to that. The offsets might be fiddly, though.
gollark: You should probably not do that.


This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.