Anthony Calvert

Anthony Calvert (1735–1809) was an English entrepreneur of the eighteenth century particularly noted for his activity as a slave trader. He was a partner of Camden, Calvert and King, one of the most prominent slave trading enterprises in London.[1] They imported tea from China and cotton from India. He also became involved in the transportation of English convicts first to Africa and later to Australia.[2]

Anthony Calvert
Born1735
Died1809
NationalityBritish
OccupationSlave trader and merchant
Board member ofCamden, Calvert and King

The partnership was also involved in South Sea whaling late in the 18th century. The firm had at least six vessels active in the trade in the years between 1782 and 1796.[3] They were also supporters of the West India Dock Company.[4]

Calvert first made several voyages from the early 1760s along slave trade routes before buying and becoming master of the Charlotte in 1766. By 1773 he went into business with Thomas King with whom he took joint command of the Three Good Friends.[1]

Citations and references

Citations

  1. Cozens, Kenneth James. "Politics, Patronage and Profit: A Case Study of Three 18th Century London Merchants" (PDF). merchantnetworks.com. Ken Cozens and Dan Byrnes. Archived from the original (PDF) on 30 March 2018. Retrieved 26 October 2016.
  2. Christopher, Emma (2011). A Merciless Place: The Fate of Britain's Convicts after the American Revolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0199782555.
  3. Jane & Charles Clayton, Shipowners investing in the South Sea whale fishery from Britain: 1775 to 1815, Hassobury, 2016, p.142.
  4. Clayton & Clayton, p.65.

References

  • Sturgess, Gary L.; Cozens, Ken (2013). "Managing a Global Enterprise in the Eighteenth Century: Anthony Calvert of The Crescent, London, 1777–1808". Mariner's Mirror. 99 (2): 171–195. doi:10.1080/00253359.2013.785134.
gollark: I mean...
gollark: Solution: make all guns from radioactive materials so people don't want to have them.
gollark: It *isn't* in less gun-y countries like this one.
gollark: I lean somewhat libertarian, so I'd say "guns to anyone who is demonstrated to be reasonably sane and able to handle guns safely and is probably not a criminal".
gollark: Probably somewhat lower. I'm not certain. Addressing the causes of crime is probably generally better than increasingly strict weapons laws.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.