Allison v. ExxonMobil Corp.

The Jacksonville, Maryland, ExxonMobil gas leak case is a series of lawsuits against ExxonMobil as a result of a February 2006 underground gasoline leak from an ExxonMobil service station in Jacksonville, Maryland.

Case history

In February 2006, nearly 26,000 gallons of gasoline leaked from a Jacksonville, Maryland, ExxonMobil station over a period of 37 days. Nearly 300 plaintiffs subsequently sued for over $1 billion for the contamination of their wells, loss of property value, physical and mental harm. The case put a spotlight on MTBE, a gasoline additive known to cause cancer in laboratory rats. Additionally, the lawsuits alleged ExxonMobil of fraud, a charge eligible for punitive damages if found guilty.

A first lawsuit was represented by Snyder, Weltchek, and Snyder. The fraud alleged in this suit was ExxonMobil's actions of intentional malice through their effective non-action in stopping the leak and providing adequate monitoring to prevent the spill.

Another large group of plaintiffs is currently being represented by The Law Offices of Peter Angelos. In July 2011, the Angelos plaintiffs were awarded, in sum, half a billion dollars in compensatory damages and another 1.5 billion dollars in punitive damages for fraud. The fraud finding involved Exxon's failure to install a promised "bathtub" design to catch potential leaking gas, and then a subsequent failure to disclose that the "bathtub" liner was not in place. There was also a dispute as to when Exxon knew of the leak, and whether they first told the public the station was"closed for renovations" rather than disclosing the issue. ExxonMobil has appealed this ruling. On February 26, 2013, the Maryland Court of Appeals threw out much of the damages, including all of the $1 billion punitive damages and some of the $650 million compensatory damages.[1] The court also ruled that new trials were needed in the case.[2]

Additional lawsuits have been filed by individual families.

Case resolution
  • In March 2009, a Baltimore County, Maryland, jury awarded the nearly 300 plaintiffs $150 million.[3][4] The awards consisted of $300,000–$1,000,000+ for the value of their homes, $4,000–500,000 for medical expenses or monitoring depending on family size and age of its members, and an average of $1 million for emotional stress. The medical monitoring will test for four types of cancer annually. As with the other case, the Maryland Court of appeals threw out much of the damages and ordered a new trial.[2]
  • ExxonMobil has appealed the damaged award amount, claiming the high value of the award is inconsistent with the actual value of the harm done by the spill and is more reflective of a roundabout way of awarding punitive damages.
  • In 2008, ExxonMobil settled with the State of Maryland for $4 million for cleanup,[3] with a possible $1 million additional fine if they do not adhere to the clean-up schedule. ExxonMobil states it has spent over $38 million as of 2009 for clean-up efforts. The entire clean-up process could take a decade or more.
gollark: Well, this seems weird and vaguely pointless.
gollark: My computer science class for next year *entirely* is, not sure how that happened.
gollark: I assume there are *some*, although it seems weirdly male-dominated somehow.
gollark: This is the polite way to say hello, in my culture.
gollark: Greetings, foolish mortals.

References
  1. "UPDATE 1-Court throws out much of $1.6 bln leak case vs Exxon". February 26, 2013. Retrieved January 18, 2018 – via Reuters.
  2. News, ABC. "U.S. News - National News". ABC News. Retrieved January 18, 2018.
  3. Exxon found liable in Jacksonville gas leak Archived 2011-04-28 at the Wayback Machine Baltimore Sun. Retrieved June 2011
  4. Jury Finds ExxonMobil Liable For $150 Million Archived 2011-11-06 at the Wayback Machine, MSNBC.com. Retrieved June 2011
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.