Aft pressure bulkhead

The aft pressure bulkhead or rear pressure bulkhead is the rear component of the pressure seal in all aircraft that cruise in a tropopause zone in the earth's atmosphere.[1] It helps maintain pressure when stratocruising and protects the aircraft from bursting due to the higher internal pressure.

The aft end of the interior of NASA's Boeing 747 Shuttle Carrier Aircraft. The aft pressure bulkhead is the white circular component, and its web-like structure led a NASA technician with a sense of humor to add a large stuffed spider to the decor.

Design

Aft pressure bulkheads can either be curved, which reduces the amount of metal needed at the cost of reducing the usable space in the airliner, or flat, which gives more internal space but also more weight.[2][3] Patents have been filed that propose deliberately creating cavities within the rear bulkhead with the purpose of providing more usable cabin space.[4] On several airliners, production of the rear pressure bulkhead has been outsourced to third party manufacturers.[5][6][7] While typically being a time-consuming and somewhat uncommon process, an aircraft's aft pressure bulkhead can be wholly replaced.[8]

During the twenty-first century, various parties became increasingly interested in developing aft pressure bulkheads composed from composite materials, seeking benefits such as lower manufacturing costs, easier sealing, elimination of corrosion risk, along with weight and part count reductions.[9] During the early 2000s, Airbus Group developed the largest manufactured resin film infusion structure then in production to function as the aft pressure bulkhead for their double-decker A380 airliner.[10] the German aerospace supplier Premium AEROTEC, which successfully manufactured the world's first thermoplastic-based rear pressure bulkhead during the 2010s; according to the firm, the new unit had reportedly resulted in a 75% reduction in processing and assembly time as well as a noticeable weight saving over traditional aluminium counterparts.[11]

Failure incidents
A diagram of the aft pressure bulkhead of the Boeing 747 used on Japan Airlines Flight 123

Multiple instances of damage to the aft pressure bulkhead have occurred; while a few cases have led to serious failures leading to aircraft losses, others have proven to be survivable.[12][13][14] Aviation certifying authorities have often mandated inspections of an aircraft's aft pressure bulkhead in the interest of safety.[15][16] Various techniques have been devised to determine the integrity of the rear pressure bulkhead; these have been used not only to inspect in-service examples but also in the design process, helping to design efficient bulkheads that possess sufficient strength to ensure a safe operational life.[17]

In 1971, British European Airways Flight 706 crashed in Belgium, killing all 63 on board; the cause was determined to be corrosion of the rear pressure bulkhead by fluid contamination, perhaps from the lavatory. The corrosion was not detectable by the inspection techniques at the time.

In 1985, Japan Airlines Flight 123 crashed after a catastrophic failure of the aft pressure bulkhead.[18] The failure occurred due to faulty repair of the bulkhead after a tailstrike seven years earlier, when a single repair patch plate was incorrectly cut in two "to make it fit". Failure of the bulkhead damaged hydraulic pipes passing through. Boeing later calculated that the incorrect installation would be expected to fail after approximately 10,000 pressurizations; the repaired aircraft accomplished 12,318 successful flights before the crash.[19][20]

During 2013, National Airlines Flight 102 crashed after loose freight on the main deck is believed to have penetrated the aft pressure bulkhead and caused damage to control systems in the vicinity of the bulkhead.[21]

gollark: That happened to me this morning. It was very unpleasant.
gollark: Sounds efficient!
gollark: If you emulate CC in BeeVM, certainly.
gollark: https://git.osmarks.net/osmarks/potatOS/
gollark: ... yes?

References
  1. "Airbus parent to build key part of rear fuselage for Boeing 787". Seattle Times. 18 October 2005.
  2. Roskam, Jan (1985). Airplane Design, Part 3. DARcorporation. p. 126. ISBN 978-1-884885-56-3.
  3. "EP1976751B1: Deformable forward pressure bulkhead for an aircraft". Google. Retrieved 13 June 2020.
  4. "US9193464B1: Aircraft having a recessed cavity in an aft pressure bulkhead wall surface and a galley moved rearwardly into the recessed cavity increasing floor space in front of the galley". Google. Retrieved 13 June 2020.
  5. "EADS to build bulkhead for 787". Flight International. 25 October 2005.
  6. "Rear Pressure Bulkhead". RUAG. Retrieved 13 June 2020.
  7. Ranson, Lori (15 June 2009). "PARIS AIR SHOW: Premium Aerotec wins third A350 structures contract". Flight International.
  8. "First Project Of Its Kind Ever Performed by Non-OEM Provider". atsginc.com. 28 January 2013.
  9. S. Venkatesh; M.G. Kutty; B. Varughese; et al. "Design, Development and Certification of Composite Rear Pressure Bulkhead for a Light Transport Aircraft" (PDF). Retrieved 13 June 2020.
  10. Black, Sara (5 January 2003). "An Elegant Solution For A Big Composite Part". compositesworld.com.
  11. "Case Study: World's First Thermoplastic Rear Pressure Bulkhead". toraytac.com. Retrieved 13 June 2020.
  12. "Inadequately Secured Pallets Penetrate the Rear Pressure Bulkhead of a Cargo B737". aerossurance.com. 13 April 2020.
  13. Kaminski-Morrow, David (2 September 2019). "DC-9 depressurised after impact from unsecured cargo". Flight International.
  14. Hemmerdinger, Jon (2 August 2019). "Another Dash 8-400 turboprop rapidly decompresses". Flight International.
  15. "AD/B737/312 - Aft Pressure Bulkhead Inspection". legislation.gov.au. 18 December 2007.
  16. "Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes". Federal Aviation Administration. 1 March 2017.
  17. Sreyas Krishnan; Anish R.; Girish K. (April 2013). "Stress Analysis of a Rear Pressure Bulkhead of the Fuselage Structure and Fatigue Life Estimation" (PDF). International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Robotics Research. ISSN 2278-0149.
  18. "Japan Airlines 747 at Gunma Prefecture: Accident Overview". Federal Aviation Authority. Retrieved 8 June 2017.
  19. "Boeing Says Crashed Japan 747 Was Incorrectly Repaired in '78". Los Angeles Times. 8 September 1985.
  20. "AIRCRAFT ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION REPORT Japan Air Lines Co., Ltd. Boeing 747 SR-100, JA8119 Gunma Prefecture, Japan August 12, 1985" (PDF). Aircraft Accident Investigation Commission. June 19, 1987. pp. 104–105. Retrieved July 9, 2020.
  21. Hemmerdinger, Jon (3 February 2015). "Shifting cargo likely damaged National 747's systems: NTSB". Flight International.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.