2020 Hobart International – Doubles
Chan Hao-ching and Latisha Chan were the defending champions,[1] but they lost in the first round to Kateryna Bondarenko and Sharon Fichman.
Doubles | |
---|---|
2020 Hobart International | |
Champions | |
Runners-up | |
Final score | 6–4, 6–4 |
Nadiia Kichenok and Sania Mirza won the title, defeating Peng Shuai and Zhang Shuai in the final, 6–4, 6–4. This was Mirza's first tournament since 2017 after maternity leave.
Seeds
Chan Hao-ching / Latisha Chan (First round) Peng Shuai / Zhang Shuai (Final) Makoto Ninomiya / Renata Voráčová (First round) Georgina García Pérez / Sara Sorribes Tormo (First round)
Draw
Key
- Q = Qualifier
- WC = Wild Card
- LL = Lucky Loser
- Alt = Alternate
- SE = Special Exempt
- PR = Protected Ranking
- ITF = ITF entry
- JE = Junior Exempt
- w/o = Walkover
- r = Retired
- d = Defaulted
Draw
First Round | Quarterfinals | Semifinals | Final | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 6 | 3 | [4] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
PR | 2 | 6 | [10] | PR | 3 | 6 | [4] | ||||||||||||||||||||
6 | 3 | [9] | 6 | 3 | [10] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 6 | [11] | 63 | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 2 | 5 | PR | 77 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
6 | 7 | 2 | 6 | [4] | |||||||||||||||||||||||
PR | 2 | 77 | [10] | PR | 6 | 4 | [10] | ||||||||||||||||||||
6 | 63 | [3] | PR | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
5 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
7 | 6 | 6 | 77 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
WC | 6 | 3 | [10] | WC | 1 | 62 | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 2 | 6 | [5] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
63 | 2 | 2 | w/o | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Alt | 77 | 6 | Alt | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
WC | 4 | 1 | 2 | w/o | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 6 | 6 |
gollark: And you're an idiot because it doesn't mean that now.
gollark: It's bridged to the osmarks.net apioforum actually.
gollark: …
gollark: Regarding actually selecting on children: I think you could make some reasonable argument about not disadvantaging children genetically or something but also people are terrible and could not be trusted to do this in a nonterrible way.
gollark: limons did mention something about just using it for membership in some group and not for deciding who reproduces, but that's not particularly eugenicsy and just vaguely stupid like mensa.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.