2018 Odlum Brown Vancouver Open – Men's Doubles

James Cerretani and Neal Skupski were the defending champions but only Skupski chose to defend his title, partnering Luke Bambridge. Skupski successfully defended his title.

Men's Doubles
2018 Odlum Brown Vancouver Open
Champions Luke Bambridge
Neal Skupski
Runners-up Marc Polmans
Max Purcell
Final score4–6, 6–3, [10–6]

Bambridge and Skupski won the title after defeating Marc Polmans and Max Purcell 4–6, 6–3, [10–6] in the final.

Seeds

  1. Jonathan Erlich / Aisam-ul-Haq Qureshi (Quarterfinals)
  2. Luke Bambridge / Neal Skupski (Champions)
  3. Austin Krajicek / Purav Raja (Quarterfinals)
  4. Evan King / Nathan Pasha (First round)

Draw

Key

First Round Quarterfinals Semifinals Final
1 J Erlich
A-u-H Qureshi
6 77
Alt Hunter Johnson
Yates Johnson
3 62 1 J Erlich
A-u-H Qureshi
3 1
G Barrère
Q Halys
77 1 [6] A Lawson
H Reese
6 6
A Lawson
H Reese
65 6 [10] A Lawson
H Reese
4 3
3 A Krajicek
P Raja
6 6 M Polmans
M Purcell
6 6
R Roelofse
L Saville
3 4 3 A Krajicek
P Raja
6 65 [4]
M Polmans
M Purcell
6 3 [10] M Polmans
M Purcell
4 77 [10]
WC JC Aragone
Benjamin Sigouin
4 6 [6] M Polmans
M Purcell
6 3 [6]
A Bolt
J Thompson
3 6 [10] 2 L Bambridge
N Skupski
4 6 [10]
WC Joshua Peck
Luka Vukovic
6 3 [8] A Bolt
J Thompson
3 4
T Fabbiano
M Reid
1 6 [10] T Fabbiano
M Reid
6 6
4 E King
N Pasha
6 3 [8] T Fabbiano
M Reid
3 2
L Broady
J O'Mara
4 4 2 L Bambridge
N Skupski
6 6
H Hach Verdugo
A Siljeström
6 6 H Hach Verdugo
A Siljeström
4 64
Y Maden
S Travaglia
1 3 2 L Bambridge
N Skupski
6 77
2 L Bambridge
N Skupski
6 6
gollark: However, it has about 10x worse encoding speed, and the encoders are not hugely production-ready, so use is basically limited to giant interweb companies.
gollark: AV1 is better from a licensing perspective, and more bitrate-efficient than H.265.
gollark: Like how even though H.265 is better than H.264 in basically every way, half the internet is stuck on H.264 because ??? licensing ????? Chromium.
gollark: Anyway, obviously the round earth is a superior technical solution, but you can bodge the flat-earth thing into *kind of* working and the patent issues make it much cheaper.
gollark: No, a point is dimensionless.

References

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.