2017 Rio Open – Doubles

Juan Sebastián Cabal and Robert Farah were the defending champions, but lost in the final to Pablo Carreño Busta and Pablo Cuevas, 4–6, 7–5, [8–10].

Doubles
2017 Rio Open
Champions Pablo Carreño Busta
Pablo Cuevas
Runners-up Juan Sebastián Cabal
Robert Farah
Final score6–4, 5–7, [10–8]
Main article: 2017 Rio Open

Seeds
  1. Jamie Murray / Bruno Soares (Semifinals)
  2. Łukasz Kubot / Marcelo Melo (Quarterfinals)
  3. Pablo Carreño Busta / Pablo Cuevas (Champions)
  4. Juan Sebastián Cabal / Robert Farah (Final)

Draw

Key

Draw
First Round Quarterfinals Semifinals Final
1 J Murray
B Soares 		6 6
M Daniell
M Demoliner 		4 2 1 J Murray
B Soares 		6 5 [11]
PR T Robredo
A Sá 		4 3 A Molteni
D Schwartzman 		3 7 [9]
A Molteni
D Schwartzman 		6 6 1 J Murray
B Soares 		4 6 [10]
3 P Carreño Busta
P Cuevas 		6 6 3 P Carreño Busta
P Cuevas 		6 3 [12]
S González
D Marrero 		3 3 3 P Carreño Busta
P Cuevas 		6 7
P Lorenzi
J Sousa 		6 68 [5] Q F Bagnis
G Elias 		4 5
Q F Bagnis
G Elias 		2 710 [10] 3 P Carreño Busta
P Cuevas 		6 5 [10]
G Durán
A Ramos Viñolas 		65 65 4 JS Cabal
R Farah 		4 7 [8]
N Monroe
A Sitak 		77 77 N Monroe
A Sitak 		2 2
WC T Bellucci
T Monteiro 		1 4 4 JS Cabal
R Farah 		6 6
4 JS Cabal
R Farah 		6 6 4 JS Cabal
R Farah 		64 78 [10]
PR S Bolelli
F Fognini 		6 62 [8] J Peralta
H Zeballos 		77 66 [6]
J Peralta
H Zeballos 		4 77 [10] J Peralta
H Zeballos 		6 6
WC F Neis
J Souza 		1 64 2 Ł Kubot
M Melo 		4 4
2 Ł Kubot
M Melo 		6 77

Qualifying

Seeds
  1. Guilherme Clezar / Fabiano de Paula (First round)
  2. Facundo Bagnis / Gastão Elias (Qualified)

Qualifiers
  1. Facundo Bagnis / Gastão Elias

Qualifying draw
First Round Qualifying Competition
          
1 Guilherme Clezar
Fabiano de Paula 		5 4
Federico Gaio
Alessandro Giannessi 		7 6
Federico Gaio
Alessandro Giannessi 		4 6 [7]
2 Facundo Bagnis
Gastão Elias 		6 2 [10]
WC Orlando Luz
Felipe Meligeni Alves 		4 65
2 Facundo Bagnis
Gastão Elias 		6 77
gollark: Why would you just randomly replace SSDs every year?
gollark: SSDs still cost ~4x more per GB and the reliability is not that different in a stationary system.
gollark: Depends on use pattern - do you want to read only, or read and write lots, or what? In general probably not.
gollark: So yes, anyway, there's non-computer progress and dismissing the computer progress is stupid.
gollark: Modern general purpose compression algorithms are also somewhat better than they were and improving.

References
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.