2017 Ningbo Challenger – Doubles
Jonathan Eysseric and Sergiy Stakhovsky were the defending champions but chose not to defend their title.
Doubles | |
---|---|
2017 Ningbo Challenger | |
Champions | ![]() ![]() |
Runners-up | ![]() ![]() |
Final score | 7–5, 6–3 |
Radu Albot and Jose Statham won the title after defeating Jeevan Nedunchezhiyan and Christopher Rungkat 7–5, 6–3 in the final.
Seeds
Jeevan Nedunchezhiyan / Christopher Rungkat (Final) Toshihide Matsui / Vishnu Vardhan (First round) Nicolás Jarry / Peter Polansky (First round) Gong Maoxin / Zhang Ze (First round)
Draw
Key
- Q = Qualifier
- WC = Wild Card
- LL = Lucky Loser
- Alt = Alternate
- SE = Special Exempt
- PR = Protected Ranking
- ITF = ITF entry
- JE = Junior Exempt
- w/o = Walkover
- r = Retired
- d = Defaulted
First Round | Quarterfinals | Semifinals | Final | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 3 | 2 | 1 | ![]() ![]() | 2 | 6 | [10] | ||||||||||||||||||||
WC | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 5 | [10] | WC | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 2 | [7] | ||||||||||||||||||
WC | ![]() ![]() | 2 | 7 | [3] | 1 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||
4 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 3 | [8] | ![]() ![]() | 1 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 4 | 6 | [10] | ![]() ![]() | 64 | 68 | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 2 | 77 | [5] | ![]() ![]() | 77 | 710 | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 6 | 63 | [10] | 1 | ![]() ![]() | 5 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 78 | 4 | [10] | ![]() ![]() | 7 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 66 | 6 | [1] | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 6 | 7 | ![]() ![]() | 3 | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
3 | ![]() ![]() | 2 | 5 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 6 | 77 | ![]() ![]() | 2 | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
WC | ![]() ![]() | 1 | 65 | ![]() ![]() | 77 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | ![]() ![]() | 64 | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2 | ![]() ![]() | 2 | 3 |
gollark: If you instead lift a 50kg thing 100 metres, which is useful for combat and many practical situations I'm sure, that is 12kcal i.e. about a tenth of a cereal bar.
gollark: According to `units`, the amount of energy needed to list a 100kg thing two metres is 0.4 dietary calories. That's totally manageable.
gollark: The Consortium.
gollark: Or with some I/O bits, if you really wanted to... search... real-life sorted lists?
gollark: Why would that be an entire spell? It would only be used as part of other things, presumably.
References
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.