2017 Guzzini Challenger – Doubles
Kevin Krawietz and Albano Olivetti were the defending champions but chose not to defend their title.
Doubles | |
---|---|
2017 Guzzini Challenger | |
Champions | ![]() ![]() |
Runners-up | ![]() ![]() |
Final score | 6–7(3–7), 6–4, [12–10] |
Jonathan Eysseric and Quentin Halys won the title after defeating Julian Ocleppo and Andrea Vavassori 6–7(3–7), 6–4, [12–10] in the final.
Seeds
Jonathan Eysseric / Quentin Halys (Champions) Steven de Waard / Ben McLachlan (Semifinals) Marin Draganja / Tomislav Draganja (Semifinals) Tomasz Bednarek / David Pel (First round)
Draw
Key
- Q = Qualifier
- WC = Wild Card
- LL = Lucky Loser
- Alt = Alternate
- SE = Special Exempt
- PR = Protected Ranking
- ITF = ITF entry
- JE = Junior Exempt
- w/o = Walkover
- r = Retired
- d = Defaulted
First Round | Quarterfinals | Semifinals | Final | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 5 | [10] | |||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 3 | 7 | [5] | 1 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 0 | [11] | |||||||||||||||||||
WC | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | WC | ![]() ![]() | 1 | 6 | [9] | |||||||||||||||||||
WC | ![]() ![]() | 2 | 2 | 1 | ![]() ![]() | 77 | 77 | ||||||||||||||||||||
3 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 2 | [11] | 3 | ![]() ![]() | 65 | 65 | |||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 4 | 6 | [9] | 3 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 2 | 4 | ![]() ![]() | 2 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | 1 | ![]() ![]() | 63 | 6 | [12] | ||||||||||||||||||||
Alt | ![]() ![]() | w/o | WC | ![]() ![]() | 77 | 4 | [10] | ||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | Alt | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 4 | [8] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
WC | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | WC | ![]() ![]() | 3 | 6 | [10] | |||||||||||||||||||
4 | ![]() ![]() | 3 | 4 | WC | ![]() ![]() | 77 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 1 | 64 | 2 | ![]() ![]() | 64 | 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||
PR | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 77 | PR | ![]() ![]() | ||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 2 | 3 | 2 | ![]() ![]() | w/o | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 |
gollark: All the parser implementations around should accept that as valid, and you can use a fixed amount of size.
gollark: Okay, very hacky but technically workable: have an XTMF metadata block of a fixed size, and after the actual JSON data, instead of just ending it with a `}`, have enough spaces to fill up the remaining space then a `}`.
gollark: XTMF was not really designed for this use case, so it'll be quite hacky. What you can do is leave a space at the start of the tape of a fixed size, and stick the metadata at the start of that fixed-size region; the main problem is that start/end locations are relative to the end of the metadata, not the start of the tape, so you'll have to recalculate the offsets each time the metadata changes size. Unfortunately, I just realized now that the size of the metadata can be affected by what the offset is.
gollark: The advantage of XTMF is that your tapes would be playable by any compliant program for playback, and your thing would be able to read tapes from another program.
gollark: Tape Shuffler would be okay with it, Tape Jockey doesn't have the same old-format parsing fallbacks and its JSON handling likely won't like trailing nuls, no idea what tako's program thinks.
References
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.