2017 Challenger Banque Nationale de Drummondville – Singles

Dan Evans was the defending champion, but decided not to participate this year.

Singles
2017 Challenger Banque Nationale de Drummondville
Champion Denis Shapovalov
Runner-up Ruben Bemelmans
Final score6–3, 6–2

Denis Shapovalov won the title, defeating Ruben Bemelmans 6–3, 6–2 in the final.

Seeds

  1. Adam Pavlásek (First round)
  2. Peter Polansky (Second round)
  3. Quentin Halys (Second round, retired)
  4. Ruben Bemelmans (Final)
  5. Vincent Millot (First round)
  6. Tennys Sandgren (Second round)
  7. Sam Groth (First round)
  8. Igor Sijsling (First round)

Draw

Key

Finals

Semifinals Final
          
John-Patrick Smith 4 1
4 Ruben Bemelmans 6 6
4 Ruben Bemelmans 3 2
Denis Shapovalov 6 6
Denis Shapovalov 7 6
WC Félix Auger-Aliassime 5 3

Top half

First Round Second Round Quarterfinals Semifinals
1 A Pavlásek 3 3
L Lokoli 6 6 L Lokoli 5 6 1
WC P Bester 3 4 J-P Smith 7 4 6
J-P Smith 6 6 J-P Smith 61 77 6
WC B Schnur 6 6 Q T Pütz 77 65 3
S Bangoura 3 3 WC B Schnur 62 66
Q T Pütz 6 6 Q T Pütz 77 78
7 S Groth 4 4 J-P Smith 4 1
4 R Bemelmans 7 6 4 R Bemelmans 6 6
Yannik Reuter 5 1 4 R Bemelmans 6 7
Q L Broady 77 6 Q L Broady 4 5
Alt E Struvay 65 3 4 R Bemelmans 6 65 77
G Sakharov 6 6 G Sakharov 4 77 65
WC F Peliwo 2 1 G Sakharov 6 7
L Saville 4 2 6 T Sandgren 3 5
6 T Sandgren 6 6

Bottom half

First Round Second Round Quarterfinals Semifinals
5 V Millot 77 1 1
Alt D Nguyen 64 6 6 Alt D Nguyen 2 1
M Authom 5 1r B Rola 6 6
B Rola 7 3 B Rola 66 4
E Corrie 4 3 D Shapovalov 78 6
D Shapovalov 6 6 D Shapovalov 4
A Arnaboldi 61 77 1 3 Q Halys 1r
3 Q Halys 77 62 6 D Shapovalov 7 6
8 I Sijsling 1 4 WC F Auger-Aliassime 5 3
A De Minaur 6 6 A De Minaur 6 6
Q M Bachinger 6 4 1 M McDonald 4 1
M McDonald 0 6 6 A De Minaur 5 3
WC F Auger-Aliassime 6 3 7 WC F Auger-Aliassime 7 6
Q A Bossel 2 6 5 WC F Auger-Aliassime 6 6
Alt G Barrère 4 6 3 2/Alt P Polansky 3 4
2/Alt P Polansky 6 3 6
gollark: I have to admit I do like the "concrete and large things of glass" aesthetic, although generally it could use more colors.
gollark: If doing nothing creates more evil than some sort of complex evil-creation system, then a good evil maximizer would decide to switch to doing nothing, if it was made aware of this.
gollark: Probably less bad stuff, though, than an organization which is actively trying to do bad stuff and is somewhat good at it.
gollark: Competent evil is going to do lots of evil things. Not-very-competent not-evil is not going to do many things, but at least it won't do many evil things.
gollark: > Fascism is evil, but at least its competentCompetent evil is probably worse than not-very-competent not-evil.

References

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.