2016 Union budget of India

2016 Union budget of India is the annual financial statement of India for the fiscal year 2016–2017. It was presented before the parliament on 29 February 2016 by the Finance Minister of India, Arun Jaitley.[1] The printing of the budget documents began with a traditional Halwa ceremony on 19 February 2016.[2] For Budget 2016-17, the government invited suggestions from citizens through Twitter for the first time, even conducting a series of polls to gauge public priorities and expectations from the Budget. [3]

 () 2016 Union budget of India
Emblem of India
Submitted byArun Jaitley, Finance Minister
Presented29 February 2016
ParliamentIndian Parliament
PartyBhartiya Janta Party
Websitehttp://indiabudget.nic.in
 2015
2017

Key points

10.6 billion (US$150 million) revenue loss through direct tax proposals, and 206.7 billion (US$2.9 billion) revenue gain through indirect tax proposals. Revenue gain of 196 billion (US$2.7 billion) in Union Budget 2016 proposals.[3] Surcharge was increased from 12% to 15% on tax on all incomes above 1 crore (US$140,000) and those earning dividend of over 10 lakh (US$14,000) per annum will now have to pay tax on it.[4] Monetary limit for deciding an appeal by a single member Bench of ITAT enhanced from 15 lakh (US$21,000) to 50 lakh (US$70,000).[5] STT (Securities Transaction Tax) was retained at 0.1% for delivery based equities.[6]

Allocations

  • 9 billion (US$130 million) fora buffer stock of pulses.[3]
  • 773.83 billion (US$11 billion) to the home ministry of which 674.08 billion (US$9.5 billion) is under non-plan and 99.75 billion (US$1.4 billion) under plan heads.[7]
  • 360 billion (US$5.0 billion) for agriculture and farmer welfare[8]
  • 880 billion (US$12 billion) towards rural development[8]
  • 2.21 lakh crore (US$31 billion) for roads, railways and other facilities[9]
  • 210 billion (US$2.9 billion) was allocated to the Urban Development Ministry, while Housing and Poverty Alleviation got 54 billion (US$760 million).[10]

Complete list of allocations and receipts can be found on the official site [11]

Reactions

Opposition member and former Prime Minister of India, Dr. Manmohan Singh termed it a "mixed bag Budget" with no big idea.[12]

gollark: There is also the "secondary processor exemption" thing, which caused the Librem people to waste a lot of time on having a spare processor on their SoC load a blob into the SoC memory controller from some not-user-accessible flash rather than just using the main CPU cores. This does not improve security because you still have the blob running with, you know, full control of RAM, yet RYF certification requires solutions like this.
gollark: It would be freer™, in my opinion, to have all the firmware distributed sanely via a package manager, and for the firmware to be controllable by users, than to have it entirely hidden away.
gollark: So you can have proprietary firmware for an Ethernet controller or bee apifier or whatever, but it's only okay if you deliberately stop the user from being able to read/write it.
gollark: No, it's how they're okay with things having proprietary firmware *but only if the user cannot interact with it*.
gollark: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/stallman-kth.html

See also

References

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.