2016 Sparkassen Open – Doubles
Sergey Betov and Mikhail Elgin were the defending champions but only Betov returned, partnering Tomasz Bednarek. Betov lost in the quarterfinals to Mateusz Kowalczyk and Antonio Šančić.
Doubles | |
---|---|
2016 Sparkassen Open | |
Champion | |
Runner-up | |
Final score | 4–6, 7–6(7–5), [10–2] |
James Cerretani and Philipp Oswald won the title after defeating Mateusz Kowalczyk and Antonio Šančić 4–6, 7–6(7–5), [10–2] in the final.
Seeds
Guillermo Durán / Andrés Molteni (First round) Aliaksandr Bury / Igor Zelenay (First round) James Cerretani / Philipp Oswald (Champions) Mateusz Kowalczyk / Antonio Šančić (Final)
Draw
Key
- Q = Qualifier
- WC = Wild Card
- LL = Lucky Loser
- Alt = Alternate
- SE = Special Exempt
- PR = Protected Ranking
- ITF = ITF entry
- JE = Junior Exempt
- w/o = Walkover
- r = Retired
- d = Defaulted
First Round | Quarterfinals | Semifinals | Final | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 4 | 6 | [7] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
WC | 6 | 2 | [10] | WC | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||
PR | 6 | 6 | PR | 4 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
WC | 2 | 2 | WC | 4 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 2 | 6 | [10] | 4 | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||
6 | 3 | [4] | 4 | 6 | 62 | [10] | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 2 | 1 | 77 | [3] | |||||||||||||||||||||||
6 | 6 | 4 | 6 | 65 | [2] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
6 | 77 | 3 | 4 | 77 | [10] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 64 | 4 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
PR | 4 | 4 | 3 | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 6 | 6 | 3 | 7 | 77 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
WC | 7 | 63 | [10] | 5 | 63 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
5 | 77 | [3] | WC | 6 | 2 | [8] | |||||||||||||||||||||
6 | 3 | [15] | 3 | 6 | [10] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 2 | 6 | [13] |
gollark: It works better on philosophers, since you can steal their wallet while they're distracted thinking about it.
gollark: They probably can't/won't eternally torture you, but there's a *possibility* of that infinite harm which is reduced by giving them £100, and if you accept the Pascal's Wager logic you should do that.
gollark: There's actually another similar thing, Pascal's *Mugging*, in which someone comes up to you and says "give me £100 or I will eternally torture you after you die".
gollark: But there are an infinitely large number of possible gods, and some do weirder things like "punish/reward entirely at random", "have no interest whatsoever in humanity", "punish people who believe in other gods", and all that, and Pascal's Wager just *ignores* those.
gollark: Pascal's Wager might work if the only options are "no god" or "one god, and it's the one you believe in, and they'll reward you if you believe and punish you otherwise".
References
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.