2016 Shimadzu All Japan Indoor Tennis Championships – Doubles
Benjamin Mitchell and Jordan Thompson are the defending champions, but only Mitchell defending his title partnering Matthew Barton .
Doubles | |
---|---|
2016 Shimadzu All Japan Indoor Tennis Championships | |
Champions | |
Runners-up | |
Final score | 6–3 , 7–6(9–7) |
Mitchell and Barton withdrew before their quarterfinal match with third seeds Li Ze and Peng Hsien-yin .
Gong Maoxin and Yi Chu-huan won the title, defeating Go Soeda and Yasutaka Uchiyama in the final 6–3, 7–6(9–7) .
Seeds
Sanchai Ratiwatana / Sonchat Ratiwatana (Quarterfinals) Bai Yan / Chen Ti (First round) Li Zhe / Peng Hsien-yin (Semifinals) Gong Maoxin / Yi Chu-huan (Champions)
Draw
Key
- Q = Qualifier
- WC = Wild Card
- LL = Lucky Loser
- Alt = Alternate
- SE = Special Exempt
- PR = Protected Ranking
- ITF = ITF entry
- JE = Junior Exempt
- w/o = Walkover
- r = Retired
- d = Defaulted
First Round | Quarterfinals | Semifinals | Final | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 3 | 6 | [10] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
WC | 6 | 3 | [8] | 1 | 4 | 63 | |||||||||||||||||||||
7 | 2 | [5] | 6 | 77 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
5 | 6 | [10] | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 6 | 6 | 3 | 4 | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 4 | 3 | w/o | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
63 | 7 | [10] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
77 | 5 | [5] | 3 | 67 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
77 | 2 | [10] | 4 | 6 | 79 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
62 | 6 | [4] | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
WC | 6 | 65 | [6] | 4 | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 4 | 77 | [10] | 4 | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||
5 | 77 | [10] | 4 | 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
WC | 7 | 65 | [7] | 5 | 6 | [10] | |||||||||||||||||||||
Alt | 6 | 2 | [10] | Alt | 7 | 2 | [7] | ||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 4 | 6 | [8] |
gollark: Say I want to use Signal, which is better for privacy than WhatsApp, but my friends refuse to use Signal too because they don't care. I'm now forced to use WhatsApp and compromise privacy somewhat.
gollark: Well, if people *want* to interact with you for whatever reason, they have to use Facebook or whatever else you're on.
gollark: If you use, say, Facebook, and won't use non-Facebook stuff which is better for privacy, you are giving Facebook money and making people use Facebook to communicate with you.
gollark: I mean, most of the more privacy-oriented stuff is free and open source.
gollark: As I said, it's not doing *much* to other people but it is doing something, which is why your threshold for that should probably be... above zero?
References
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.