2016 Open Engie de Touraine – Doubles
Alexandra Cadanțu and Cristina Dinu were the defending champions, but Dinu chose not to participate. Cadanțu partnered Ekaterina Yashina, but they were defeated in the final by Ivana Jorović and Lesley Kerkhove, 6–3, 7–5.
Doubles | |
---|---|
2016 Open Engie de Touraine | |
Champions | |
Runners-up | |
Final score | 6–3, 7–5 |
Seeds
Quirine Lemoine / Eva Wacanno (Quarterfinals) Alexandra Cadanțu / Ekaterina Yashina (Final) Amandine Hesse / Barbora Štefková (Withdrew) Alice Matteucci / Camilla Rosatello (Withdrew)
Draw
Key
- Q = Qualifier
- WC = Wild Card
- LL = Lucky Loser
- Alt = Alternate
- SE = Special Exempt
- PR = Protected Ranking
- ITF = ITF entry
- JE = Junior Exempt
- w/o = Walkover
- r = Retired
- d = Defaulted
First round | Quarterfinals | Semifinals | Final | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 2 | 6 | [10] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
6 | 2 | [6] | 1 | 3 | 6 | [9] | |||||||||||||||||||||
6 | 2 | [6] | WC | 6 | 3 | [11] | |||||||||||||||||||||
WC | 1 | 6 | [10] | WC | 4 | 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Alt | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 4 | Alt | 4 | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 3 | 6 | 7 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
6 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
WC | 4 | 3 | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
6 | 4 | [10] | 4 | 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Alt | 4 | 6 | [6] | 63 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 5 | 2 | 77 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
WC | 6 | 7 | WC | 1 | 65 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
66 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 77 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 78 | 6 |
gollark: Which is the problem.
gollark: But you can't automatically detect whether a particular keyword or trending item is a political ideology.
gollark: The best* way would probably be a Twitter scraper to determine how much people are talking about each ideology, but their API is really annoying to get access to and you'd need to explicitly compile a list or something.
gollark: I should totally implement this! It would be really easy with a simple hashing-type thing. The hard part would just be finding the political views and determine the weights (as I assume you don't want all politics with the same frequency).
gollark: Consistent political views are for people with consistent political views.
References
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.