2016 French Open – Boys' Doubles
Álvaro López San Martín and Jaume Munar were the defending champions, but were no longer eligible to participate.
Boys' Doubles | |
---|---|
2016 French Open | |
Champions | |
Runners-up | |
Final score | 6–3, 6–4 |
Yishai Oliel of Israel and Patrik Rikl of the Czech Republic won the title, defeating Chung Yun-seong and Orlando Luz in the final, 6–3, 6–4.[1]
Seeds
Ulises Blanch / Máté Valkusz (Second round) Félix Auger-Aliassime / Denis Shapovalov (Second round) Miomir Kecmanović / Casper Ruud (Semifinals) Jay Clarke / Stefanos Tsitsipas (Quarterfinals) Youssef Hossam / Jurabek Karimov (Quarterfinals) Alexei Popyrin / Wu Yibing (First round) John McNally / Jeffrey John Wolf (Quarterfinals) Alejandro Davidovich Fokina / Yosuke Watanuki (First round)
Draw
Key
- Q = Qualifier
- WC = Wild Card
- LL = Lucky Loser
- Alt = Alternate
- SE = Special Exempt
- PR = Protected Ranking
- ITF = ITF entry
- JE = Junior Exempt
- w/o = Walkover
- r = Retired
- d = Defaulted
Finals
Semifinals | Final | ||||||||||||
6 | 4 | [4] | |||||||||||
4 | 6 | [10] | |||||||||||
6 | 6 | ||||||||||||
3 | 4 | ||||||||||||
3 | 4 | 77 | [9] | ||||||||||
6 | 65 | [11] | |||||||||||
Top half
First round | Second round | Quarterfinals | Semifinals | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 4 | 6 | [10] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
6 | 4 | [7] | 1 | 6 | 3 | [7] | |||||||||||||||||||||
6 | 6 | 4 | 6 | [10] | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
5 | 3 | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
7 | 6 | 6 | 4 | [10] | |||||||||||||||||||||||
WC | 6 | 4 | [10] | WC | 3 | 6 | [4] | ||||||||||||||||||||
8 | 3 | 6 | [6] | 6 | 4 | [4] | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 79 | 6 | 4 | 6 | [10] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
67 | 1 | 4 | w/o | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
6 | 77 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 64 | 4 | 68 | 6 | [8] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
6 | 6 | 710 | 2 | [10] | |||||||||||||||||||||||
WC | 2 | 3 | 2 | 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
6 | 1 | 4 |
Bottom half
gollark: You can write an interpreter for that in a few hundred lines of high-level language.
gollark: If you want "simple", how about, I don't know, lisp?
gollark: "Costless" how?
gollark: I'd partly agree, but that doesn't mean ALL ABSTRACTION is hard to use.
gollark: If we accept your ridiculous "simple to implement means easy" thing, then machine code is easier than assembly, and... CPU microcode? is easier than machine code.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.