2015 Grand Prix SAR La Princesse Lalla Meryem – Doubles
Garbiñe Muguruza and Romina Oprandi were the defending champions, but they chose not to participate this year.
Tímea Babos and Kristina Mladenovic won the title, defeating Laura Siegemund and Maryna Zanevska in the final, 6–1, 7–6(7–5).
Doubles | |
---|---|
2015 Grand Prix SAR La Princesse Lalla Meryem | |
Champions | ![]() ![]() |
Runners-up | ![]() ![]() |
Final score | 6–1, 7–6(7–5) |
Seeds
Tímea Babos / Kristina Mladenovic (Champions) Darija Jurak / Arantxa Parra Santonja (Quarterfinals) Alexandra Panova / Renata Voráčová (First round) Raluca Olaru / Sílvia Soler Espinosa (Quarterfinals)
Draw
Key
- Q = Qualifier
- WC = Wild Card
- LL = Lucky Loser
- Alt = Alternate
- SE = Special Exempt
- PR = Protected Ranking
- ITF = ITF entry
- JE = Junior Exempt
- w/o = Walkover
- r = Retired
- d = Defaulted
Draw
First Round | Quarterfinals | Semifinals | Final | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
WC | ![]() ![]() | 1 | 1 | 1 | ![]() ![]() | 7 | 7 | ||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 4 | 77 | [9] | ![]() ![]() | 5 | 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 6 | 61 | [11] | 1 | ![]() ![]() | 7 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||
3 | ![]() ![]() | 4 | 63 | ![]() ![]() | 5 | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 6 | 77 | ![]() ![]() | 66 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 7 | 77 | ![]() ![]() | 78 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 5 | 65 | 1 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 77 | |||||||||||||||||||||
WC | ![]() ![]() | 1 | 0 | ![]() ![]() | 1 | 65 | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 67 | [10] | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 2 | 4 | 4 | ![]() ![]() | 4 | 79 | [7] | ||||||||||||||||||||
4 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | ![]() ![]() | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 6 | 1 | [8] | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 3 | 6 | [10] | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 5 | 6 | [5] | 2 | ![]() ![]() | 4 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||
2 | ![]() ![]() | 7 | 0 | [10] |
gollark: There are plenty of things in, say, maths, which could have been thought up ages ago, and seem stupidly obvious now, but weren't. Such as modern place value notation.
gollark: Obvious things now may just not have been then.
gollark: Hindsight bias exists.
gollark: As I said, a REALLY bad one would be allocating the vote randomly. This satisfies almost nobody, which makes it a "good compromise" by your definition, but it does that because it has tons of flaws.
gollark: There are LESS BAD ones.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.