2014 Wimbledon Championships – Gentlemen's Invitation Doubles
Thomas Enqvist and Mark Philippoussis successfully defended their title, defeating Jacco Eltingh and Paul Haarhuis in the final, 3–6, 6–3, [10–3] to win the Gentlemen's Invitation Doubles tennis title at the 2014 Wimbledon Championships.
Gentlemen's Invitation Doubles | |
---|---|
2014 Wimbledon Championships | |
Champions | ![]() ![]() |
Runners-up | ![]() ![]() |
Final score | 3–6, 6–3, [10–3] |
Draw
Key
- Q = Qualifier
- WC = Wild Card
- LL = Lucky Loser
- Alt = Alternate
- SE = Special Exempt
- PR = Protected Ranking
- ITF = ITF entry
- JE = Junior Exempt
- w/o = Walkover
- r = Retired
- d = Defaulted
Final
Final | ||||||
![]() ![]() | 3 | 6 | [10] | |||
![]() ![]() | 6 | 3 | [3] |
Group A
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
RR W–L |
Set W–L |
Game W–L |
Standings | ||
A1 | ![]() ![]() |
3–6, 6–7(5–7) | 1–1, ret. (w/ Knowles) |
6–4, 7–6(7–4) | 2–1 | 3–2 | 23–24 | 2 | |
A2 | ![]() ![]() |
6–3, 7–6(7–5) | 6–4, 3–6, [10–4] (w/ Wilkinson) |
6–4, 6–7(6–8), [10–5] | 3–0 | 6–2 | 36–30 | 1 | |
A3 | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
1–1, ret. (w/ Knowles) |
4–6, 6–3, [4–10] (w/ Wilkinson) |
6–3, 1–6, [7–10] (w/ Wilkinson) |
0–2 0–1 |
2–4 0–1 |
17–21 1–1 |
4 X | |
A4 | ![]() ![]() |
4–6, 6–7(4–7) | 4–6, 7–6(8–6), [5–10] | 3–6, 6–1, [10–7] (w/ Wilkinson) |
1–2 | 3–5 | 32–33 | 3 |
Standings are determined by: 1) Number of wins; 2) Number of matches; 3) In two-players-ties, head-to-head records; 4) In three-players-ties, percentage of sets won, or of games won; 5) Steering Committee decision.
Group B
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
RR W–L |
Set W–L |
Game W–L |
Standings | ||
B1 | ![]() ![]() |
3–6, 4–6 | 7–5, 5–7, [10–8] | 6–4, 6–7(2–7), [7–10] | 1–2 | 3–5 | 32–36 | 3 | |
B2 | ![]() ![]() |
6–3, 6–4 | 7–5, 7–5 | 6–3, 6–4 | 3–0 | 6–0 | 38–24 | 1 | |
B3 | ![]() ![]() |
5–7, 7–5, [8–10] | 5–7, 5–7 | 2–6, 5–7 | 0–3 | 1–6 | 29–40 | 4 | |
B4 | ![]() ![]() |
4–6, 7–6(7–2), [10–7] | 3–6, 4–6 | 6–2, 7–5 | 2–1 | 4–3 | 32–31 | 2 |
Standings are determined by: 1) Number of wins; 2) Number of matches; 3) In two-players-ties, head-to-head records; 4) In three-players-ties, percentage of sets won, or of games won; 5) Steering Committee decision.
gollark: No, they are is valid too.
gollark: And makes it harder for people who need it to get it.
gollark: The trouble with adding lots of rules and procedures and stuff to it is that it imposes a lot of additional cost to delivering welfare at all.
gollark: If another pandemic one doesn't happen (in the time before people inevitably forget any lessons they might have learned), or COVID-19 doesn't prepare us well for the next one, I think it will have been a net negative.
gollark: Realistically, anything big will be rolled back once we're not in a crisis.
References
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.