2014 Sacramento Challenger – Singles

Donald Young was the defending champion but chose to play in the Japan Open instead.

Singles
2014 Sacramento Challenger
Champion Sam Querrey
Runner-up Stefan Kozlov
Final score6–3, 6–4

Sam Querrey won the title by defeating Stefan Kozlov 6–3, 6–4 in the final.

Seeds

  1. Sam Querrey (Champion)
  2. Tim Smyczek (Semifinals)
  3. Bradley Klahn (First round)
  4. Michael Russell (First round, retired)
  5. Denis Kudla (Quarterfinals)
  6. Peter Polansky (First round)
  7. Thiemo de Bakker (First round, retired)
  8. Frank Dancevic (First round)

Draw

Key

Finals

Semifinals Final
          
1 Sam Querrey 5 6 6
PR John Millman 7 4 3
1 Sam Querrey 6 6
WC Stefan Kozlov 3 4
WC Stefan Kozlov 3 6 77
2 Tim Smyczek 6 3 61

Top half

First Round Second Round Quarterfinals Semifinals
1 S Querrey 77 6
K Edmund 64 4 1 S Querrey 6 77
WC D Nguyen 6 77 D Nguyen 3 63
A Kuznetsov 4 64 1 S Querrey 6 6
Q L Broady 77 3 0 SE J Donaldson 2 1
L Vanni 62 6 6 L Vanni 63 65
SE J Donaldson 6 3 SE J Donaldson 77 77
7 T de Bakker 2 0r 1 S Querrey 5 6 6
4 M Russell 2r PR J Millman 7 4 3
Q D Kutrovsky 3 Q D Kutrovsky 5 3
PR J Millman 4 6 77 PR J Millman 7 6
PR T Sandgren 6 3 63 PR J Millman 6 6
A Bolt 4 4 WC B Fratangelo 1 2
Q M Giron 6 6 Q M Giron 63 5
WC B Fratangelo 6 6 WC B Fratangelo 77 7
8 F Dancevic 4 4

Bottom half

First Round Second Round Quarterfinals Semifinals
6 P Polansky 7 4 65
W Odesnik 5 6 77 W Odesnik 4 2r
R Williams 4 77 77 R Williams 6 4
L Sorensen 6 63 62 R Williams 6 63 4
WC S Kozlov 6 3 6 WC S Kozlov 4 77 6
R Harrison 1 6 3 WC S Kozlov 6 3 6
J-P Smith 6 2 6 J-P Smith 4 6 4
3 B Klahn 2 6 3 WC S Kozlov 3 6 77
5 D Kudla 6 6 2 T Smyczek 6 3 61
WC C Altamirano 1 1 5 D Kudla 6 2 6
Q E Quigley 6 0 62 Alt E Ymer 4 6 3
Alt E Ymer 3 6 77 5 D Kudla 2 1
R Ginepri 4 1 2 T Smyczek 6 6
J McGee 6 6 J McGee 4 3
J Thompson 1 2 2 T Smyczek 6 6
2 T Smyczek 6 6
gollark: And you would be disincentivized to hold stock in things, too.
gollark: Hmm. Did you *know* they were going to do that?
gollark: If limited liability was gone, investment in risky things/startups/new businesses/whatever *would* go down a lot, which I think is bad.
gollark: Not so risky that you could lose an *unknowable* amount of money.
gollark: Which probably means high premiums, which means people won't buy it and then complain when something bad happens.

References

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.