2014 Comerica Bank Challenger – Doubles
Ruben Bemelmans and Laurynas Grigelis took the title, beating Purav Raja and Sanam Singh 6–3, 4–6, [11–9]
Doubles | |
---|---|
2014 Comerica Bank Challenger | |
Champion | ![]() ![]() |
Runner-up | ![]() ![]() |
Final score | 6–3, 4–6, [11–9] |
Seeds
Austin Krajicek / John-Patrick Smith (Semifinals) Kevin King / Divij Sharan (Quarterfinals) Rameez Junaid / Artem Sitak (Semifinals) Purav Raja / Sanam Singh (Final)
Draw
Key
- Q = Qualifier
- WC = Wild Card
- LL = Lucky Loser
- Alt = Alternate
- SE = Special Exempt
- PR = Protected Ranking
- ITF = ITF entry
- JE = Junior Exempt
- w/o = Walkover
- r = Retired
- d = Defaulted
Draw
First Round | Quarterfinals | Semifinals | Final | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 3 | [10] | |||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 3 | 6 | [4] | 1 | ![]() ![]() | 5 | 6 | [10] | |||||||||||||||||||
WC | ![]() ![]() | 1 | 7 | [7] | ![]() ![]() | 7 | 3 | [8] | |||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 6 | 5 | [10] | 1 | ![]() ![]() | 7 | 5 | [9] | |||||||||||||||||||
4 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | 4 | ![]() ![]() | 5 | 7 | [11] | |||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 2 | 1 | 4 | ![]() ![]() | 77 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 78 | 4 | [11] | ![]() ![]() | 64 | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 66 | 6 | [9] | 4 | ![]() ![]() | 3 | 6 | [9] | |||||||||||||||||||
WC | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 64 | [6] | WC | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 4 | [11] | ||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 2 | 77 | [10] | ![]() ![]() | 2 | 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 77 | 2 | [22] | 3 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||
3 | ![]() ![]() | 64 | 6 | [24] | 3 | ![]() ![]() | 65 | 3 | |||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 1 | 77 | [6] | WC | ![]() ![]() | 77 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||
WC | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 64 | [10] | WC | ![]() ![]() | 7 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||
Q | ![]() ![]() | 3 | 4 | 2 | ![]() ![]() | 5 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||
2 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 |
gollark: I could probably improve that.
gollark: flyto_good does the ascension and movement thing in parallel, which is possibly bad.
gollark: How does "navigate.lua" compare to flyto_good?
gollark: It does. GTech™ is simply too good.
gollark: We tested this. Performance scaling with coffee consumption has severe diminishing returns, eventually becoming negative several tens of percent below GTech™ performance.
References
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.