2014 Adidas International Gimcheon – Singles

Gilles Müller won the title, defeating Tatsuma Ito in the final, 7–6(7–5), 5–7, 6–4.

Singles
2014 Adidas International Gimcheon
Champion Gilles Müller
Runner-up Tatsuma Ito
Final score7–6(7–5), 5–7, 6–4

This was the first edition of the event.

Seeds

  1. Lukáš Lacko (Semifinals)
  2. Rajeev Ram (Quarterfinals)
  3. Go Soeda (Second round)
  4. Samuel Groth (Quarterfinals)
  5. Tatsuma Ito (Final)
  6. Yūichi Sugita (Semifinals, retired right ankle injury)
  7. Gilles Müller (Champion)
  8. Hiroki Moriya (First round)

Draw

Key

Finals

Semifinals Final
          
1 Lukáš Lacko 5 3
7 Gilles Müller 7 6
7 Gilles Müller 77 5 6
5 Tatsuma Ito 65 7 4
5 Tatsuma Ito 6 2
6 Yūichi Sugita 2 0r

Top Half

First Round Second Round Quarterfinals Semifinals
1 L Lacko 6 1 6
PR J Millman 4 6 3 1 L Lacko 7 6
Q D Kutrovsky 6 3 4 SE A Bolt 5 4
SE A Bolt 2 6 6 1 L Lacko 6 6
  L Grigelis 3 6 6 A Weintraub 2 4
J-P Smith 6 4 3   L Grigelis 5 1
  A Weintraub 6 6   A Weintraub 7 6
8 H Moriya 2 1 1 L Lacko 5 3
4 S Groth 4 6 78 7 G Müller 7 6
WC Hy Chung 6 1 66 4 S Groth 5 77 6
LL M Neuchrist 4 64 Q J Jung 7 65 4
Q J Jung 6 77 4 S Groth 3 2
Q T Chen 1 6 77 7 G Müller 6 6
K Kravchuk 6 2 61 Q T Chen 5 3
A Kudryavtsev 1 77 4 7 G Müller 7 6
7 G Müller 6 65 6

Bottom Half

First Round Second Round Quarterfinals Semifinals
5 T Ito 7 7
M Reid 5 5 5 T Ito 6 7
  D Smethurst 2 7 6 D Smethurst 3 5
T-h Yang 6 5 3 5 T Ito 6 77
WC Kim Young Seok 1 2 L Saville 2 63
L Saville 6 6   L Saville 77 4 6
WC Ho Chung 3 4 3 G Soeda 62 6 2
3 G Soeda 6 6 5 T Ito 6 2
6 Y Sugita 6 6 6 Y Sugita 2 0r
R de Voest 2 4 6 Y Sugita 6 6
M Chiudinelli 6 6 M Chiudinelli 1 2
B Mitchell 2 4 6 Y Sugita 6 7
WC Y-k Lim 4 6 4 2 R Ram 2 5
A Krajicek 6 4 6   A Krajicek 5 6 5
Q F Wolmarans 77 3 4 2 R Ram 7 4 7
2 R Ram 64 6 6
gollark: Oh dear this is somewhat bees, *how* do I go around stopping a service?
gollark: This is an example of C bad, although not one they can change.
gollark: Stuff should be Unicode by default, and not just *assume* ASCII.
gollark: Replying to https://discord.com/channels/346530916832903169/348702212110680064/748476086299656193And yet you have "char" which basically means "8-bit integer" everywhere?
gollark: I'm saying that if you have a way to represent an 8-bit integer/byte, it SHOULD NOT BE CALLED CHAR, and modern languages get it right.

References

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.