2014 AON Open Challenger – Singles

Albert Ramos won the tournament, beating Mate Delić 6–1, 7–5 in the final.

Singles
2014 AON Open Challenger
Champion Albert Ramos
Runner-up Mate Delić
Final score6–1, 7–5
Main article: 2014 AON Open Challenger

Seeds
  1. Albert Ramos (Champion)
  2. Dustin Brown (First round)
  3. Benoît Paire (Second round)
  4. Albert Montañés (First round)
  5. Andreas Beck (Semifinals)
  6. Damir Džumhur (Second round)
  7. Aljaž Bedene (Quarterfinals)
  8. Gastão Elias (First round)

Draw

Key

Finals
Semifinals Final
          
1 Albert Ramos 6 7
Márton Fucsovics 1 5
1 Albert Ramos 6 7
Alt Mate Delić 1 5
5 Andreas Beck 4 5
Alt Mate Delić 6 7

Top Half
First Round Second Round Quarterfinals Semifinals
1 A Ramos 7 5 6
Q A Virgili 5 7 3 1 A Ramos 6 6
A Šetkić 6 77 A Šetkić 1 3
WC Francesco Picco 3 63 1 A Ramos 6 6
J Hájek 7 6 7 A Bedene 3 2
WC G Mager 5 4 J Hájek 4 4
A Arnaboldi 6 3 63 7 A Bedene 6 6
7 A Bedene 3 6 77 1 A Ramos 6 7
4 A Montañés 2 4 M Fucsovics 1 5
M Fucsovics 6 6 M Fucsovics 3 6 6
WC A Giannessi 5 2 G Andreozzi 6 3 4
G Andreozzi 7 6 M Fucsovics 79 1 77
Alt U Ignatik 6 6 J Kubler 67 6 63
F Volandri 3 4 Alt U Ignatik 6 2 3
J Kubler 6 6 J Kubler 2 6 6
8 G Elias 4 4

Bottom Half
First Round Second Round Quarterfinals Semifinals
5 A Beck 6 6
F Gaio 2 4 5 A Beck 6 6
P Starace 4 1 C Lindell 4 3
C Lindell 6 6 5 A Beck 7 6
M Cecchinato 6 6 M Cecchinato 5 3
N Basilashvili 4 2 M Cecchinato 6 77
P Sousa 0 2 3 B Paire 2 63
3 B Paire 6 6 5 A Beck 4 5
6 D Džumhur 6 6 Alt M Delić 6 7
Q J Kovalík 4 4 6 D Džumhur 4 6 4
Q V Galović 6 3 1 Alt M Delić 6 2 6
Alt M Delić 4 6 6 Alt M Delić 78 1 710
WC M Trevisan 64 6 6 SE V Troicki 66 6 68
Q G Naso 77 4 4 WC M Trevisan 6 3 64
SE V Troicki 6 77 SE V Troicki 4 6 77
2 D Brown 1 64
gollark: This has been explained already.
gollark: I also do this, but:- how often do the search queries contain things you dislike- how hard is it to scroll past it or whatever, given that average queries probably won't bring up much of that
gollark: I do not think search is a significant issue, and the logreading thing can be fixed.
gollark: I mean, you could shunt it to an archive channel via webhook things after however long, but that would have its own issues.
gollark: The precise time is tunable, after some amount of time it would probably cease to be discussed. And why should they *not* exist? The logreading issue is fixable as I said, search... maybe less so, but I'm not sure how many search queries actually turn up that stuff *now* and how big an issue it would be.

References
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.