2012 Yemeni President Cup
The 2012 Yemeni President Cup is the 14th edition to be held and back after a years absence due to the 2011 Yemeni revolution.
| Country |  |
|---|---|
| Champions | Al-Ahli Ta'izz |
| Runners-up | Al-Tali'aa Taizz |
← 2010 2013 → | |
The winners qualify for the 2013 AFC Cup.
The competition started in October with a Preliminary Round featuring four sides. The winners advance to the round of 32 and then so on in a knockout basis played over one game.
Preliminary round
| Team 1 | Score | Team 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Al Shabab Ibb |
1-0 | |
| Al-Tali'aa Taizz |
(w/o) 1 | |
- 1 Al Ahly Al Hadyadh left the field during play and the result was awarded 3:0 to Al-Tali'aa Taizz
Round of 32
| Team 1 | Score | Team 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tadamon Shapwah |
2-1 | |
| Al-Hilal Al-Sahili |
3-0 | |
| Al-Shula |
3-0 | |
| Najm Sba |
0-0 (3-1) | |
| Shmsan |
2-3 | |
| Nasser Aden |
3-2 | |
| Nasser Al Talla |
0-0 (4-2) | |
| Al Rasheed Ta'izz |
0-2 | |
| Al-Oruba Zabid |
0-0 (8-9) | |
| Al Tilal |
3-0 | |
| Salam Al-Garfa |
0-0 (3-4) | |
| Al-Ahli Ta'izz |
2-1 | |
| Seuon |
1-0 | |
| May 22 San'a' |
1-1 (4-3) | |
| Al Shrth |
(w/o) 1 | |
| Hassan |
(w/o) 2 | |
- 1 Shabab Al Jeel failed to turn up and the result was awarded 3:0 to Al Shrth
- 2 Hassan failed to turn up and the result was awarded 3:0 to Al Fateh
Round of 16
Quarter finals
| Team 1 | Score | Team 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Al Fateh |
0-2 | |
| May 22 San'a' |
1-1 (0-3) | |
| Nasser Aden |
1-2 | |
| Al Tilal |
2-1 | |
Semi finals
| Team 1 | Score | Team 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Al-Ahli Ta'izz |
0-0 (9-8) | |
| Al-Tali'aa Taizz |
1-0 | |
Final
gollark: > And just so its clear I am a minarchist I just think the government needs to do some shitI roughly agree with that. I'm just not sure that the specific set of stuff it needs to do includes phone lines and such.
gollark: You can have... multiple phone line companies? We do in lots of places, even.> you made it so why let anyone else use itThey can pay you for it.> In times of high darwinist selection, it doesn't matter what the current paradigms are.Um. No.
gollark: I was replying to BearcatBen with the "People who need them?" thing, but oh well, ye,s very edgy.
gollark: > Why so?I mean, for one thing, I care about... quality of life? general stability? Lots of things OTHER than just technology? For another, why would ancap magically improve advancement?
gollark: People who need them?
References
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.