2012 Torneo Omnia Tenis Ciudad Madrid – Doubles

David Marrero and Rubén Ramírez Hidalgo were the defending champions but Marrero decided not to participate.
Hidalgo played alongside Daniel Muñoz de la Nava.
Daniel Gimeno-Traver and Iván Navarro defeated Colin Ebelthite and Jaroslav Pospíšil 6–2, 4–6, [10–7] in the final to win the title.

Doubles
2012 Torneo Omnia Tenis Ciudad Madrid
Champions Daniel Gimeno-Traver
Iván Navarro
Runners-up Colin Ebelthite
Jaroslav Pospíšil
Final score6–2, 4–6, [10–7]

Seeds

  1. Andre Begemann / Martin Emmrich (Semifinals)
  2. Colin Ebelthite / Jaroslav Pospíšil (Final)
  3. Daniel Muñoz de la Nava / Rubén Ramírez Hidalgo (Semifinals)
  4. Daniel Gimeno-Traver / Iván Navarro (Champions)

Draw

Key

Draw

First Round Quarterfinals Semifinals Final
1 A Begemann
M Emmrich
6 6  
  A Giannessi
A Motti
1 4   1 A Begemann
M Emmrich
6 6  
  Iván Arenas-Gualda
E López-Pérez
6 6     I Arenas-Gualda
E López-Pérez
3 2  
WC Iván Gómez Mantilla
Pedro Salas
4 3   1 A Begemann
M Emmrich
2 3  
4 D Gimeno-Traver
I Navarro
6 7   4 D Gimeno-Traver
I Navarro
6 6  
  J-L Struff
P Torebko
3 5   4 D Gimeno-Traver
I Navarro
w/o    
  F Delbonis
S Gutiérrez Ferrol
6 6     F Delbonis
S Gutiérrez Ferrol
     
Alt Romano Frantzen
A Ward
3 4   4 D Gimeno-Traver
I Navarro
6 4 [10]
  P Červenák
A Satschko
6 77   2 C Ebelthite
J Pospíšil
2 6 [7]
Alt Ó Burrieza-López
S Pérez-Pérez
1 65     P Červenák
A Satschko
6 3 [5]
  A Brugués-Davi
J Sousa
2 0   3 D Muñoz de la Nava
R Ramírez Hidalgo
3 6 [10]
3 D Muñoz de la Nava
R Ramírez Hidalgo
6 6   3 D Muñoz de la Nava
R Ramírez Hidalgo
4 2  
  F Argüello
J Martí
77 6   2 C Ebelthite
J Pospíšil
6 6  
WC Antonio Sánchez García
Ricardo Villacorta-Alonso
65 4     F Argüello
J Martí
5 5  
WC R Ortega-Olmedo
Jaime Pulgar-García
2 4   2 C Ebelthite
J Pospíšil
7 7  
2 C Ebelthite
J Pospíšil
6 6  
gollark: Oh, while I'm here, DO NOT pay for a Lego Mindstorms NXT 2.0 brick! You can run all your programs on a graphing calculator!
gollark: I cannot be bothered to read all messages in existence. What are the happenings?
gollark: So that doesn't really work.
gollark: But it doesn't define addition as an axiom either.
gollark: I think what they mean is that you introduced a new definition, and the fact that `*` is that can't be derived from anything else.

References

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.