2012 Tashkent Challenger – Singles

Denis Istomin was the defending champion but decided not to participate.
Uladzimir Ignatik won the final 6–3, 7–6(7–3) against Lukáš Lacko.

Singles
2012 Tashkent Challenger
Champion Uladzimir Ignatik
Runner-up Lukáš Lacko
Final score6–3, 7–6(7–3)
Main article: 2012 Tashkent Challenger

Seeds
  1. Lukáš Lacko (Final)
  2. Flavio Cipolla (Second Round)
  3. Dudi Sela (Quarterfinals)
  4. Malek Jaziri (Second Round)
  5. Ivan Dodig (Semifinals)
  6. Vasek Pospisil (First Round)
  7. Dmitry Tursunov (Second Round)
  8. Karol Beck (Second Round)

Draw

Key

Finals
Semifinals Final
          
1 Lukáš Lacko 6 77  
5 Ivan Dodig 4 64  
1 Lukáš Lacko 3 63  
  Uladzimir Ignatik 6 77  
  Jan Mertl 3 3  
  Uladzimir Ignatik 6 6  

Top Half
First Round Second Round Quarterfinals Semifinals
1 L Lacko 6 6  
  I Sergeyev 2 3   1 L Lacko 6 6  
Q S Singh 0 4   Q O Nedovyesov 2 2  
Q O Nedovyesov 6 6   1 L Lacko 6 6  
  A Weintraub 6  4  7    A Weintraub 2 4  
  B Klein 4  6  5    A Weintraub 6 6  
  Y Bhambri 1 3   8 K Beck 3 3  
8 K Beck 6 6   1 L Lacko 6 77  
3 D Sela 7 6   5 I Dodig 4 64  
  K Kravchuk 5 0   3 D Sela 4 77 6
Q V Vardhan 3 4     I Kunitsyn 6 62 4
  I Kunitsyn 6 6   3 D Sela 4 6 3
Q D Molchanov 4 1   5 I Dodig 6 4 6
  A Menéndez 6 6     A Menéndez 0 3  
  I Minář 2 4   5 I Dodig 6 6  
5 I Dodig 6 6  

Bottom Half
First Round Second Round Quarterfinals Semifinals
7 D Tursunov 6 4  
  D Muñoz de la Nava 3 2r   7 D Tursunov 4 77 1
WC Nigmat Shofayziev 62 4     D Lajović 6 65 6
  D Lajović 77 6     D Lajović 4 4  
  D Meffert 4 6 69   J Mertl 6 6  
  J Mertl 6 2 711   J Mertl 6 77  
  P Gojowczyk 4 4   4 M Jaziri 3 65  
4 M Jaziri 6 6     J Mertl 3 3  
6 V Pospisil 2 6 3   U Ignatik 6 6  
WC F Dustov 6 3 6 WC F Dustov 77 7  
WC S Ikramov 3 5     A Golubev 64 5  
  A Golubev 6 7   WC F Dustov 4 7 62
  H Moriya 4 4     U Ignatik 6 5 77
  U Ignatik 6 6     U Ignatik 6 60 6
WC Sergey Shipilov 1 6 0 2 F Cipolla 3 77 3
2 F Cipolla 6 4 6
gollark: Perhaps.
gollark: Well, yes. And when I looked into this the algorithms were either really simple and quite boring or unfathomably complex number theory.
gollark: I was thinking "find the factors of a number" or something, but that seems waaay too simple.
gollark: I figure it would probably be bad to do anything involving graphics, hm.
gollark: 3? I was hoping for at least 5.

References
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.