2012 Heineken Open – Doubles
Marcel Granollers and Tommy Robredo were the defending champions but decided not to participate.
Doubles | |
---|---|
2012 Heineken Open | |
Champions | ![]() ![]() |
Runners-up | ![]() ![]() |
Final score | 6–3, 6–2 |
No.1 seeds Oliver Marach and Alexander Peya won the title beating František Čermák and Filip Polášek in the final, 6–3, 6–2.
Seeds
Oliver Marach / Alexander Peya (Champions) Eric Butorac / Bruno Soares (Semifinals) František Čermák / Filip Polášek (Final) Santiago González / Christopher Kas (Quarterfinals)
Draw
Key
- Q = Qualifier
- WC = Wild Card
- LL = Lucky Loser
- Alt = Alternate
- SE = Special Exempt
- PR = Protected Ranking
- ITF = ITF entry
- JE = Junior Exempt
- w/o = Walkover
- r = Retired
- d = Defaulted
Draw
First Round | Quarterfinals | Semifinals | Final | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 2 | 4 | 1 | ![]() ![]() | w/o | ||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | ![]() ![]() | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 0 | 3 | 1 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | ![]() ![]() | 65 | 6 | [10] | WC | ![]() ![]() | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 77 | 1 | [5] | 4 | ![]() ![]() | 5 | 65 | ||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 6 | 5 | [8] | WC | ![]() ![]() | 7 | 77 | ||||||||||||||||||||
WC | ![]() ![]() | 4 | 7 | [10] | 1 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 4 | 6 | [4] | 3 | ![]() ![]() | 3 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 6 | 2 | [10] | ![]() ![]() | 7 | 2 | [5] | ||||||||||||||||||||
WC | ![]() ![]() | 3 | 2 | 3 | ![]() ![]() | 5 | 6 | [10] | |||||||||||||||||||
3 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | 3 | ![]() ![]() | 77 | 5 | [10] | |||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 1 | 60 | 2 | ![]() ![]() | 63 | 7 | [7] | ||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 6 | 77 | ![]() ![]() | 1 | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 5 | 0 | 2 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | ![]() ![]() | 7 | 6 |
gollark: No, not you.
gollark: > hoping for more people to die and greater economic damage because it would boost your political ideology
gollark: The economic damage is almost certainly better than the increased deaths/sick people which would result from doing less.
gollark: And I'd argue that not knowing exactly what it can do means you should treat it more seriously.
gollark: It's very infectious, mortality rate between, what, 0.2% and 10%, depending (probably only 10% as an upper bound with really overloaded healthcare), and not really any good treatments yet.
References
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.