2012 Challenge Bell – Doubles
Raquel Kops-Jones and Abigail Spears were the defending champions, but decided not to participate this year.
Doubles | |
---|---|
2012 Challenge Bell | |
Champions | ![]() ![]() |
Runners-up | ![]() ![]() |
Final score | 7–6(7–5), 6–7(6–8), [10–7] |
Tatjana Malek and Kristina Mladenovic won the title, defeating Alicja Rosolska and Heather Watson 7–6(7–5), 6–7(6–8), [10–7] in the final.
Seeds
Alicja Rosolska / Heather Watson (Final) Līga Dekmeijere / Petra Martić (First round) Tatjana Malek / Kristina Mladenovic (Champions) Lindsay Lee-Waters / Megan Moulton-Levy (First round)
Draw
Key
- Q = Qualifier
- WC = Wild Card
- LL = Lucky Loser
- Alt = Alternate
- SE = Special Exempt
- PR = Protected Ranking
- ITF = ITF entry
- JE = Junior Exempt
- w/o = Walkover
- r = Retired
- d = Defaulted
First Round | Quarterfinals | Semifinals | Final | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
WC | ![]() ![]() | 2 | 2 | 1 | ![]() ![]() | 77 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 2 | 6 | [8] | ![]() ![]() | 64 | 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 6 | 3 | [10] | 1 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||
4 | ![]() ![]() | 5 | 6 | [4] | ![]() ![]() | 4 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 7 | 4 | [10] | ![]() ![]() | 1 | 6 | [5] | ||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 4 | 3 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 1 | [10] | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | 1 | ![]() ![]() | 65 | 78 | [7] | ||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 0 | 62 | 3 | ![]() ![]() | 77 | 66 | [10] | ||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 6 | 77 | ![]() ![]() | 2 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 6 | 3 | [8] | 3 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||
3 | ![]() ![]() | 4 | 6 | [10] | 3 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 2 | 5 | ![]() ![]() | 3 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
WC | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 7 | WC | ![]() ![]() | 3 | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 2 | 6 | [10] | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 3 | [4] |
gollark: > anyway, free speech as i understand is just your right to speak out against the government, not to just spout random bullshitNo, not really. I mean, as a legal principle yes.
gollark: > free speech is saying "proof ?" to "hitler did nothing wrong" and not "no u", free speech has pros and consNo, free speech is just not silencing people who disagree with you, or who you disagree with.
gollark: Someone must run the bot, and a bot cannot be owner directly.
gollark: We wanted to have bot-driven democracy but it's impractical.
gollark: > free speech is just another way of saying you are an enabler of nazisGo <:bees:724389994663247974> yourself.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.