2012 HP Open – Doubles
Kimiko Date-Krumm and Zhang Shuai were the defending champions but Zhang decided not to participate.
Date-Krumm played alongside Heather Watson and they reached the final but lost to the American pair Raquel Kops-Jones and Abigail Spears with the score of 1–6, 4–6.
Doubles | |
---|---|
2012 HP Open | |
Champions | ![]() ![]() |
Runners-up | ![]() ![]() |
Final score | 6–1, 6–4 |
Seeds
Raquel Kops-Jones / Abigail Spears (Champions) Anabel Medina Garrigues / Zheng Jie (Semifinals) Darija Jurak / Katalin Marosi (Semifinals) Kimiko Date-Krumm / Heather Watson (Final)
Draw
Key
- Q = Qualifier
- WC = Wild Card
- LL = Lucky Loser
- Alt = Alternate
- SE = Special Exempt
- PR = Protected Ranking
- ITF = ITF entry
- JE = Junior Exempt
- w/o = Walkover
- r = Retired
- d = Defaulted
Draw
First Round | Quarterfinals | Semifinals | Final | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 2 | 3 | 1 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 1 | 4 | ![]() ![]() | 3 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | 1 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | ![]() ![]() | 4 | 6 | [10] | 3 | ![]() ![]() | 1 | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 6 | 4 | [7] | 3 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | ![]() ![]() | 1 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | w/o | 1 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 7 | 6 | 4 | ![]() ![]() | 1 | 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||
WC | ![]() ![]() | 5 | 2 | ![]() ![]() | 67 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 3 | 2 | 4 | ![]() ![]() | 79 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | 4 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 4 | [10] | |||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | 2 | ![]() ![]() | 3 | 6 | [8] | ||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 3 | 4 | ![]() ![]() | 3 | 5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 4 | 4 | 2 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 7 | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 |
gollark: Seems reasonable.
gollark: Does it? I mean, there are other governments which seem to ignore it. I think Poland?
gollark: It's not a *good* justification but it sort of happens maybe.
gollark: I mean that because one political group says "climate change is a problem", the other one then does the opposite and goes "no, it's [fine/fake/safe to ignore]".
gollark: Oh no.
References
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.