2012 American Express – TED Open – Singles

Denis Istomin was the defending champion but decided not to participate.
Dmitry Tursunov won the title, defeating Adrian Mannarino 6–4, 7–6(7–5) in the final.

TED Open – Singles
2012 American Express – TED Open
Champion Dmitry Tursunov
Runner-up Adrian Mannarino
Final score6–4, 7–6(7–5)
Main article: 2012 American Express – TED Open

Seeds
  1. Malek Jaziri (Quarterfinals)
  2. Rajeev Ram (First Round)
  3. Grega Žemlja (Semifinals)
  4. Michael Russell (Semifinals)
  5. Matthias Bachinger (First Round)
  6. Igor Kunitsyn (Second Round)
  7. Karol Beck (Quarterfinals)
  8. Dmitry Tursunov (Champion)

Draw

Key

Finals
Semifinals Final
          
8 Dmitry Tursunov 7 6  
4 Michael Russell 5 4  
8 Dmitry Tursunov 6 77  
  Adrian Mannarino 4 65  
3 Grega Žemlja 65 4  
  Adrian Mannarino 77 6  

Top Half
First Round Second Round Quarterfinals Semifinals
1 M Jaziri 1 77 6
  J Baker 6 62 4 1 M Jaziri 6 6  
  R Albot 6 6     R Albot 2 4  
  É Chvojka 2 2   1 M Jaziri 3 6 2
Q M Abel 4 5   8 D Tursunov 6 3 6
  R Borvanov 6 7     R Borvanov 2 4  
  M Bašić 1 66   8 D Tursunov 6 6  
8 D Tursunov 6 78   8 D Tursunov 7 6  
4 M Russell 6 3 6 4 M Russell 5 4  
Q J McGee 3 6 3 4 M Russell 6 6  
  G Sakharov 6 6     G Sakharov 2 3  
WC Efe Yurtacan 4 3   4 M Russell 2 78 6
WC H Akkoyun 4 6 3   M Teixeira 6 66 4
  D Zivkovic 6 3 6   D Zivkovic 4 4  
  M Teixeira 4 6 6   M Teixeira 6 6  
5 M Bachinger 6 4 4

Bottom Half
First Round Second Round Quarterfinals Semifinals
7 K Beck 6 6  
Q L Burton 4 2   7 K Beck 6 6  
Q R Ghedin 710 6   Q R Ghedin 2 1  
  M İlhan 68 4   7 K Beck 5 3  
  A Kuznetsov 6 6   3 G Žemlja 7 6  
WC D Durmus 1 4     A Kuznetsov 4 6 3
  K Kravchuk 61 3   3 G Žemlja 6 3 6
3 G Žemlja 77 6   3 G Žemlja 65 4  
6 I Kunitsyn 6 7     A Mannarino 77 6  
  M Zverev 3 5   6 I Kunitsyn 0 6 2
  A Mannarino 6 6     A Mannarino 6 4 6
  L Vanni 4 2     A Mannarino 77 4 77
WC B Erguden 5 1     A Menéndez 63 6 63
  B Klein 7 6     B Klein 4 77 3
  A Menéndez 6 6     A Menéndez 6 63 6
2 R Ram 4 3  
gollark: For "fast stupider web-y Python" Go somewhat works, but I don't think it's generally very good.
gollark: I think languages which do are generally better than ones which don't.
gollark: Yes. However, having a language which actually ALLOWS YOU TO WRITE THAT as a generalized thing would be better without compromising elegance with weird special cases like Go also does.
gollark: Parallel iterators would make that code clearer, actually simpler (not Go-"simpler") and less error-prone.
gollark: I don't think the way Go encourages you to write code is very good.

References
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.