2012 American Express – TED Open – Singles

Denis Istomin was the defending champion but decided not to participate.
Dmitry Tursunov won the title, defeating Adrian Mannarino 6–4, 7–6(7–5) in the final.

TED Open – Singles
2012 American Express – TED Open
Champion Dmitry Tursunov
Runner-up Adrian Mannarino
Final score6–4, 7–6(7–5)
Main article: 2012 American Express – TED Open

Seeds
  1. Malek Jaziri (Quarterfinals)
  2. Rajeev Ram (First Round)
  3. Grega Žemlja (Semifinals)
  4. Michael Russell (Semifinals)
  5. Matthias Bachinger (First Round)
  6. Igor Kunitsyn (Second Round)
  7. Karol Beck (Quarterfinals)
  8. Dmitry Tursunov (Champion)

Draw

Key

Finals
Semifinals Final
          
8 Dmitry Tursunov 7 6  
4 Michael Russell 5 4  
8 Dmitry Tursunov 6 77  
  Adrian Mannarino 4 65  
3 Grega Žemlja 65 4  
  Adrian Mannarino 77 6  

Top Half
First Round Second Round Quarterfinals Semifinals
1 M Jaziri 1 77 6
  J Baker 6 62 4 1 M Jaziri 6 6  
  R Albot 6 6     R Albot 2 4  
  É Chvojka 2 2   1 M Jaziri 3 6 2
Q M Abel 4 5   8 D Tursunov 6 3 6
  R Borvanov 6 7     R Borvanov 2 4  
  M Bašić 1 66   8 D Tursunov 6 6  
8 D Tursunov 6 78   8 D Tursunov 7 6  
4 M Russell 6 3 6 4 M Russell 5 4  
Q J McGee 3 6 3 4 M Russell 6 6  
  G Sakharov 6 6     G Sakharov 2 3  
WC Efe Yurtacan 4 3   4 M Russell 2 78 6
WC H Akkoyun 4 6 3   M Teixeira 6 66 4
  D Zivkovic 6 3 6   D Zivkovic 4 4  
  M Teixeira 4 6 6   M Teixeira 6 6  
5 M Bachinger 6 4 4

Bottom Half
First Round Second Round Quarterfinals Semifinals
7 K Beck 6 6  
Q L Burton 4 2   7 K Beck 6 6  
Q R Ghedin 710 6   Q R Ghedin 2 1  
  M İlhan 68 4   7 K Beck 5 3  
  A Kuznetsov 6 6   3 G Žemlja 7 6  
WC D Durmus 1 4     A Kuznetsov 4 6 3
  K Kravchuk 61 3   3 G Žemlja 6 3 6
3 G Žemlja 77 6   3 G Žemlja 65 4  
6 I Kunitsyn 6 7     A Mannarino 77 6  
  M Zverev 3 5   6 I Kunitsyn 0 6 2
  A Mannarino 6 6     A Mannarino 6 4 6
  L Vanni 4 2     A Mannarino 77 4 77
WC B Erguden 5 1     A Menéndez 63 6 63
  B Klein 7 6     B Klein 4 77 3
  A Menéndez 6 6     A Menéndez 6 63 6
2 R Ram 4 3  
gollark: No.
gollark: The best thing I can think of *now* is some sort of toggleable indicator for "potentially uncomfortable topics" in channel names or something.
gollark: That's post-decrement, *is* it one less?
gollark: > it might not be portable to other places.I have explained why I think this.
gollark: It's interesting to actually look at the ethics and underlying causes and whatever instead of just "no discussing this"? We have a cool and rare thing here and it might not be portable to other places.

References
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.