2011 New Haven Open at Yale – Doubles

Doubles
	2011 New Haven Open at Yale
Champions	Chuang Chia-jung ; Olga Govortsova
Runners-up	Sara Errani ; Roberta Vinci
Final score	7–5, 6–2

Květa Peschke and Katarina Srebotnik were the defending champion, but they withdrew in the quarterfinals before their match against Natalie Grandin and Vladimíra Uhlířová.

Chuang Chia-jung and Olga Govortsova won the tournament. They defeated Italian pair Sara Errani and Roberta Vinci in the final, 7–5, 6–2.

Seeds

Květa Peschke / Katarina Srebotnik (Quarterfinals, withdrew)
Elena Vesnina / Anastasia Rodionova (First Round)
Chuang Chia-jung / Olga Govortsova (Champions)
Nuria Llagostera Vives / Anabel Medina Garrigues (Semifinals, withdrew)

Draw

Key

Draw

First Round					Quarterfinals					Semifinals				Final

1	K Peschke K Srebotnik	6	6
	M Kondratieva S Lefevre	3	1		1	K Peschke K Srebotnik
	N Grandin V Uhlířová	6²	6	[12]		N Grandin V Uhlířová	w/o
	K Barrois K Zakopalová	7⁷	2	[10]							N Grandin V Uhlířová	4	5
3	C-j Chuang O Govortsova	6	6							3	C-j Chuang O Govortsova	6	7
	E Daniilidou P Hercog	4	2		3	C-j Chuang O Govortsova	4	6	[10]
	I Benešová A Dulgheru	6	6			I Benešová A Dulgheru	6	0	[7]
	A Muhammed A Riske	3	3											3	C-j Chuang O Govortsova	7	6
	S-w Hsieh M Niculescu	6	7⁷												S Errani R Vinci	5	2
WC	B Augustine W Jones	2	6³			S-w Hsieh M Niculescu	6	1	[8]
	K Jans-Ignacik A Rosolska	3	4		4	N Llagostera Vives A Medina Garrigues	1	6	[10]
4	N Llagostera Vives A Medina Garrigues	6	6							4	N Llagostera Vives A Medina Garrigues
	S Errani R Vinci	6	6								S Errani R Vinci	w/o
	R Kops-Jones A Spears	4	2			S Errani R Vinci	6	7
	V Dushevina S Stephens	6	3	[10]		V Dushevina S Stephens	0	5
2	E Vesnina A Rodionova	4	6	[6]

gollark: Interestingly enough, here in the UK™, COVID-19 means general GCSE exams were cancelled, but they still want to give everyone grades without having to have summer/aütumn exæms, so they're basically just going to be guessing the grade you might have gotten.

gollark: And how well everyone else did, and stuff like the total marks on the exam.

gollark: In that case % is betttererrer.

gollark: Grades let you distance, well, grades, from actual % results on stuff.

gollark: Of course, *that* means that how good you're considered depends on how well everyone else does. Although that probably would have been the case to some extent anyway.

References

Main Draw

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.