2010 WTA Tour Championships – Singles

Serena Williams was the defending champion but did not participate due to injury.

Singles
2010 WTA Tour Championships
Champion Kim Clijsters
Runner-up Caroline Wozniacki
Final score6–3, 5–7, 6–3
Main article: 2010 WTA Tour Championships

Kim Clijsters defeated newly crowned World No. 1 Caroline Wozniacki 6–3, 5–7, 6–3 to win the tournament for the third and the last time in her career.

Francesca Schiavone & Samantha Stosur made their debuts in the event.

Players
  1. Caroline Wozniacki (Final)
  2. Vera Zvonareva (Semifinals)
  3. Kim Clijsters (Champion)
  4. Francesca Schiavone (Round Robin)
  5. Samantha Stosur (Semifinals)
  6. Jelena Janković (Round Robin)
  7. Elena Dementieva (Round Robin)
  8. Victoria Azarenka (Round Robin)

Notes:

Alternates
  1. Li Na (Not Used)
  2. Shahar Pe'er (Not Used)

Draw

Key

Finals
Semifinals Final
          
5 Samantha Stosur 63 1  
3 Kim Clijsters 77 6  
3 Kim Clijsters 6 5 6
1 Caroline Wozniacki 3 7 3
2 Vera Zvonareva 5 0  
1 Caroline Wozniacki 7 6  

Maroon Group
  Wozniacki Schiavone Stosur Dementieva RR
W–L		 Set
W–L		 Game
W–L		 Standings
1 Caroline Wozniacki 3–6, 6–1, 6–1 4–6, 3–6 6–1, 6–1 2–1 4–3 34–22 2
4 Francesca Schiavone 6–3, 1–6, 1–6 4–6, 4–6 6–4, 6–2 1–2 3–4 28–33 3
5 Samantha Stosur 6–4, 6–3 6–4, 6–4 6–4, 4–6, 6–7(4–7) 2–1 5–2 41–32 1
7 Elena Dementieva 1–6, 1–6 4–6, 2–6 4–6, 6–4, 7–6(7–4) 1–2 2–5 25–41 4

Standings are determined by: 1) Number of wins; 2) Number of matches; 3) In two-players-ties, head-to-head records; 4) In three-players-ties, percentage of sets won, or of games won; 5) Steering Committee decision.

White Group
  Zvonareva Clijsters Janković Azarenka RR
W–L		 Set
W–L		 Game
W–L		 Standings
2 Vera Zvonareva 6–4, 7–5 6–3, 6–0 7–6(7–4), 6–4 3–0 6–0 38–22 1
3 Kim Clijsters 4–6, 5–7 6–2, 6–3 6–4, 5–7, 6–1 2–1 4–3 38–30 2
6 Jelena Janković 3–6, 0–6 2–6, 3–6 4–6, 1–6 0–3 0–6 13–36 4
8 Victoria Azarenka 6–7(4–7), 4–6 4–6, 7–5, 1–6 6–4, 6–1 1–2 3–4 34–35 3

Standings are determined by: 1) Number of wins; 2) Number of matches; 3) In two-players-ties, head-to-head records; 4) In three-players-ties, percentage of sets won, or of games won; 5) Steering Committee decision.

gollark: Yes, it could probably work badly and this would be gamed a lot.
gollark: Although I don't think I'd want to encourage an increase in lawyers.
gollark: If you could somehow make medicine/law available as undergraduate things that... might help?
gollark: The UK does those, I think, and seems to be doing fine lawyer and doctor-wise.
gollark: A convincing explanation I read of the everyone-has-to-go-to-college thing is that college degrees work as a signal to employers that you have some basic competence at listening independently, doing things for delayed gain later, sort of thing, more than providing any massively work-relevant skills, and it apparently got easier/more popular to get a degree over time, so the *lack* of one works as a signal that you *lack* those basic skills.

See also

References
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.