2005 Pacific Curling Championships

The 2005 Pacific Curling Championships were held at the Taipei Arena in Taipei, Republic of China (Taiwan) from December 2 to 7.

2005 Pacific Curling Championships
Host cityTaipei, Chinese Taipei
ArenaTaipei Arena
DatesDecember 2–7
Men's winner Australia
SkipHugh Millikin
FourthIan Palangio
SecondRicky Tasker
LeadMike Woloschuk
Finalist Japan (Yoshiyuki Ohmiya)
Women's winner Japan
SkipYukako Tsuchiya
ThirdJunko Sonobe
SecondTomoko Sonobe
LeadChiemi Kameyama
AlternateMitsuki Sato
CoachEdward Dezura
Finalist China (Wang Bingyu)
« 2004
2006 »

Australia's Hugh Millikin won the men's event over Japan's Yoshiyuki Ohmiya. By virtue of reaching the finals, both nations qualified for the 2006 World Men's Curling Championship in Lowell, Massachusetts.

On the women's side, Japan's Yukako Tsuchiya defeated China's Wang Bingyu in the final. This qualified both Japan and China for the 2006 Ford World Women's Curling Championship in Grande Prairie, Alberta.

Men's

Final Round Robin Standings

Country Skip W L
 New ZealandSean Becker41
 ChinaXu Xiaoming41
 AustraliaHugh Millikin32
 JapanYoshiyuki Ohmiya23
 South KoreaBaek Jong Chul14
 Chinese TaipeiNicolas Hsu14

Playoffs

  Semifinals Finals
                     
  1  New Zealand 11 4 4  
4  Japan 6 8 6  
  4  Japan 3
  3  Australia 6
2  China 3 8 7
  3  Australia 6 5 8  
Bronze medal
   
1  New Zealand 8
2  China 3
5th place
   
5  South Korea 2
6  Chinese Taipei 11

Women's

Final Round Robin Standings

Country Skip W L
 ChinaWang Bingyu41
 JapanYukako Tsuchiya41
 New ZealandBridget Becker32
 South KoreaKim Ji Suk23
 Chinese TaipeiCheng Li-Lin14
 AustraliaHelen Wright14

Playoffs

  Semifinals Finals
                     
  1  China 10 5 10  
4  South Korea 3 6 5  
  1  China 5
  2  Japan 10
2  Japan 8 11
  3  New Zealand 7 3  
Bronze medal
   
3  New Zealand 6
4  South Korea 10
5th place
   
5  Chinese Taipei 10
6  Australia 9
gollark: - They may be working on them, but they initially claimed that they weren't necessary and they don't exist now. Also, I don't trust them to not do them wrong.- Ooookay then- Well, generics, for one: they *kind of exist* in that you can have generic maps, channels, slices, and arrays, but not anything else. Also this (https://fasterthanli.me/blog/2020/i-want-off-mr-golangs-wild-ride/), which is mostly about the file handling not being good since it tries to map on concepts which don't fit. Also channels having weird special syntax. Also `for` and `range` and `new` and `make` basically just being magic stuff which do whatever the compiler writers wanted with no consistency- see above- Because there's no generic number/comparable thing type. You would need to use `interface{}` or write a new function (with identical code) for every type you wanted to compare- You can change a signature somewhere and won't be alerted, but something else will break because the interface is no longer implemented- They are byte sequences. https://blog.golang.org/strings.- It's not. You need to put `if err != nil { return err }` everywhere.
gollark: Oh, and the error handling is terrible and it's kind of the type system's fault.
gollark: If I remember right Go strings are just byte sequences with no guarantee of being valid UTF-8, but all the functions working on them just assume they are.
gollark: Oh, and the strings are terrible.
gollark: Also, channels are not a particularly good primitive for synchronization.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.