2005 PTT Bangkok Open – Doubles
Shinobu Asagoe and Gisela Dulko won the title by defeating Conchita Martínez and Virginia Ruano Pascual 6–1, 7–5 in the final.
Doubles | |
---|---|
2005 PTT Bangkok Open | |
Champions | ![]() ![]() |
Runners-up | ![]() ![]() |
Final score | 6–1, 7–5 |
This was the first edition of the tournament.
Seeds
Conchita Martínez / Virginia Ruano Pascual (Final) Shinobu Asagoe / Gisela Dulko (Champions) Lisa McShea / Bryanne Stewart (Semifinals) Nuria Llagostera Vives / María Vento-Kabchi (Quarterfinals)
Draw
Key
- Q = Qualifier
- WC = Wild Card
- LL = Lucky Loser
- Alt = Alternate
- SE = Special Exempt
- PR = Protected Ranking
- ITF = ITF entry
- JE = Junior Exempt
- w/o = Walkover
- r = Retired
- d = Defaulted
Draw
First Round | Quarterfinals | Semifinals | Final | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 1 | 1 | 1 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 3r | ![]() ![]() | 2 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 5 | 1 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 77 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
4 | ![]() ![]() | 7 | 6 | ![]() ![]() | 0 | 65 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Q | ![]() ![]() | 5 | 2 | 4 | ![]() ![]() | 2 | 6 | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 6 | 3 | 6 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 3 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 4 | 6 | 2 | 1 | ![]() ![]() | 1 | 5 | ||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 6 | 3 | 6 | 2 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 7 | ||||||||||||||||||||
WC | ![]() ![]() | 4 | 6 | 4 | ![]() ![]() | 5 | 6 | 62 | |||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 64 | 3 | 3 | ![]() ![]() | 7 | 2 | 77 | ||||||||||||||||||||
3 | ![]() ![]() | 77 | 6 | 3 | ![]() ![]() | 3 | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 2 | 63 | 2 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 6 | 77 | ![]() ![]() | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 2 | 3 | 2 | ![]() ![]() | w/o | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 |
gollark: I mean, bringing a new sophont being into existence is a big responsibility, and choosing to start them off with some horrible genetic problem is v ery bee.
gollark: There are very something arguments regarding rights to have children, but it seems reasonable to force people to genetically modify/embryo-select their children to remove genetic diseases once the technology matures.
gollark: There may end up being some intervening time in the middle.
gollark: It's executing not-yet-children, mostly.
gollark: With increasing automation and reliance on intellectual work to design such automation things, what if they stop being that?
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.