2005 Legg Mason Tennis Classic – Doubles
Chris Haggard and Robbie Koenig were the defending champions. Haggard did not participate this year. Koenig partnered with Jim Thomas, losing in the first round.
Doubles | |
---|---|
2005 Legg Mason Tennis Classic | |
Champion | ![]() ![]() |
Runner-up | ![]() ![]() |
Final score | 6–4, 6–2 |
Mike Bryan and Bob Bryan won in the final 6–4, 6–2, against Wayne Black and Kevin Ullyett.
Seeds
Mike Bryan / Bob Bryan (Champions) Wayne Black / Kevin Ullyett (Final) Mahesh Bhupathi / Martin Damm (Semifinals) Mark Knowles / Radek Štěpánek (Semifinals)
Draw
Key
- Q = Qualifier
- WC = Wild Card
- LL = Lucky Loser
- Alt = Alternate
- SE = Special Exempt
- PR = Protected Ranking
- ITF = ITF entry
- JE = Junior Exempt
- w/o = Walkover
- r = Retired
- d = Defaulted
Draw
First Round | Quarterfinals | Semifinals | Final | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 4 | 1 | 1 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 77 | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | ![]() ![]() | 4 | 64 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
WC | ![]() ![]() | 1 | 3 | 1 | ![]() ![]() | 77 | 77 | ||||||||||||||||||||
3 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 3 | ![]() ![]() | 63 | 64 | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 4 | r | 3 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||
WC | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 65 | 4 | ![]() ![]() | 4 | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 4 | 77 | 6 | 1 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 3 | 6 | 6 | 2 | ![]() ![]() | 4 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 6 | 3 | 4 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 3 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 3 | 1 | 4 | ![]() ![]() | 3 | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||
4 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | 4 | ![]() ![]() | ||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 4 | 6 | 3 | 2 | ![]() ![]() | w/o | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 6 | 2 | 6 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 5 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 64 | 3 | 2 | ![]() ![]() | 3 | 7 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||
2 | ![]() ![]() | 77 | 6 |
gollark: It would be great if there was a better way to share code and libraries between them than dropping down to C.
gollark: Probably. The endless treadmill of new languages.
gollark: And allow holding mutable references to multiple parts of an array at once somehow.
gollark: And allow being generic over mutability; I see too many get_x and get_mut_x methods.
gollark: Maybe a cooler language could abstract the whole slice/owned object thing better.
External links
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.