2005 JPMorgan Chase Open – Doubles

Doubles
	2005 JPMorgan Chase Open
Champions	Elena Dementieva; Flavia Pennetta
Runners-up	Angela Haynes; Bethanie Mattek
Final score	6–2, 6–4

Nadia Petrova and Meghann Shaughnessy were the defending champions, but had different outcomes. While Shaughnessy did not compete this year due to a back injury, Petrova partnered with Alina Jidkova and lost in first round to Elena Dementieva and Flavia Pennetta.

Dementieva and Pennetta won the title, defeating Angela Haynes and Bethanie Mattek 6–2, 6–4 in the final. It was the 1st and only title of the year, the 5th and final title for Dementieva, and the 1st title of Pennetta, in their respective careers.

Seeds

Lisa Raymond / Samantha Stosur (Quarterfinals)
Conchita Martínez / Virginia Ruano Pascual (Semifinals)
Iveta Benešová / Bryanne Stewart (First round)
Shinobu Asagoe / Tathiana Garbin (Quarterfinals)

Draw

Key

Draw

First Round					Quarterfinals					Semifinals					Final

1	L Raymond S Stosur	7	6
	M Domachowska M Kirilenko	5	0		1	L Raymond S Stosur	6	3	2
	T Li T Sun	7	6			T Li T Sun	2	6	6
	G Dulko D Safina	5	3								T Li T Sun	3	3
4	S Asagoe T Garbin	6	7⁷							WC	A Haynes B Mattek	6	6
Q	E Callens A Serra Zanetti	3	6²		4	S Asagoe T Garbin	6³	4
	J Hopkins M Washington	3	6⁴		WC	A Haynes B Mattek	7⁷	6
WC	A Haynes B Mattek	6	7⁷												WC	A Haynes B Mattek	2	4
	E Dementieva F Pennetta	5	6	7⁷												E Dementieva F Pennetta	6	6
	A Jidkova N Petrova	7	3	6⁵		E Dementieva F Pennetta	w/o
	J Lee S Peng	6	7			J Lee S Peng
3	I Benešová B Stewart	3	5								E Dementieva F Pennetta	6	6⁶	6
	Z Yan J Zheng	2	6	6⁴						2	C Martínez V Ruano Pascual	4	7⁸	1
	ME Salerni M Vento-Kabchi	6	4	7⁷		ME Salerni M Vento-Kabchi	6	3	4
	E Daniilidou S Kuznetsova	2	2		2	C Martínez V Ruano Pascual	2	6	6
2	C Martínez V Ruano Pascual	6	6

gollark: To be mathy about this, consider n² + n + 41. If you substitute n = 0 to n = ~~40~~ 39, you'll see "wow, this produces prime numbers. I thought those were really hard and weird, what an amazing discovery".

gollark: Examples do not and cannot demonstrate some sort of general principle, particularly a more abstract one.

gollark: Again, some examples of things needing some sort of balance DO NOT imply it is good or generally necessary.

gollark: This is just an example of "you sometimes need a quantity of something which falls in some interval", not a general proof.

gollark: That seems like just "it's bad because it's something you don't consent to" and also "it's unpleasant", which is I think what we said.

External links

Main and Qualifying Draws

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.