2005 Challenge Bell – Singles

Martina Suchá was the defending champion, but decided not to participate this year.

Singles
2005 Challenge Bell
Champion Amy Frazier
Runner-up Sofia Arvidsson
Final score6–1, 7–5
Main article: 2005 Challenge Bell

Amy Frazier won the title, defeating Sofia Arvidsson 6–1, 7–5 in the final.

Seeds
  1. Nathalie Dechy (Semifinals)
  2. Daniela Hantuchová (Withdrew)
  3. Marion Bartoli (Semifinals)
  4. Laura Granville (Second round)
  5. Antonella Serra Zanetti (Second round)
  6. Amy Frazier (Champion)
  7. Jamea Jackson (First round)
  8. Sofia Arvidsson (Final)
  9. Julia Schruff (Second round)

Draw

Key

Finals
Semifinals Final
          
1 Nathalie Dechy 4 5
6 Amy Frazier 6 7
6 Amy Frazier 6 7
8 Sofia Arvidsson 1 5
8 Sofia Arvidsson 6 1
3 Marion Bartoli 4 0r

Top half
First Round Second Round Quarterfinals Semifinals
1 N Dechy 6 6
A Harkleroad 4 1 1 N Dechy 6 77
ME Salerni 711 1 6 ME Salerni 1 65
LL D Ospina 69 6 3 1 N Dechy 2 6 6
A Rodionova 7 6 WC S Dubois 6 0 0
M-È Pelletier 5 4 A Rodionova 6 4 2
WC S Dubois 7 6 WC S Dubois 3 6 6
7 J Jackson 5 4 1 N Dechy 4 5
4 L Granville 6 6 6 A Frazier 6 7
Q A Cargill 4 2 4 L Granville 2 5
H Nagyová 6 2 6 H Nagyová 6 7
J Kostanić 3 6 4 H Nagyová 4 1
Q Y Fedossova 6 6 6 A Frazier 6 6
K Brandi 4 2 Q Y Fedossova 3 0
WC A Wozniak 4 6 66 6 A Frazier 6 6
6 A Frazier 6 3 78

Bottom half
First Round Second Round Quarterfinals Semifinals
8 S Arvidsson 6 7
Q V Castellvi 2 5 8 S Arvidsson 6 6
M Paštiková 0 4 A Keothavong 3 1
A Keothavong 6 6 8 S Arvidsson 2 6 6
S Brémond 3 61 E Vesnina 6 4 1
E Vesnina 6 77 E Vesnina 6 6
C Pin 6 1 5 5 A Serra Zanetti 3 3
5 A Serra Zanetti 1 6 7 8 S Arvidsson 6 1
9 J Schruff 7 6 3 M Bartoli 4 0r
A Spears 5 3 9 J Schruff 64 3
LL Ľ Kurhajcová 2 6 5 S Perry 77 6
S Perry 6 4 7 S Perry 0 4
E Laine 6 6 3 M Bartoli 6 6
Q S Borwell 4 1 E Laine 6 1 5
S Kloesel 1 2 3 M Bartoli 2 6 7
3 M Bartoli 6 6
gollark: I did not mean that they're true statements describing the entire universe. Go with "unconditional truth" if you mean something different by "universal" too.
gollark: What?
gollark: Someone not understanding it doesn't make it false.
gollark: They're "universal truth" because they apply regardless of location etc. in the universe.
gollark: You can have "universal truth" with things like logical statements, where you can come up with things that are always true given some set of axioms. For physical/sciencey things you can just do "it's very unlikely for this to not be the case".

References
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.