2005 Advanta Championships – Singles
Amélie Mauresmo was the two-time defending champion, and successfully defended her title.[1][2]
Singles | |
---|---|
2005 Advanta Championships | |
Champion | ![]() |
Runner-up | ![]() |
Final score | 7–5, 2–6, 7–5 |
Seeds
Lindsay Davenport (withdrew due to flu) Maria Sharapova (withdrew due to a right thumb sprain) Amélie Mauresmo (Champion) Elena Dementieva (Final) Patty Schnyder (withdrew due to left hand contusion) Nadia Petrova (Semifinals, withdrew due to a right heel contusion) Nicole Vaidišová (Semifinals) Jelena Janković (First round) Vera Zvonareva (First round)
Draw
Key
- Q = Qualifier
- WC = Wild Card
- LL = Lucky Loser
- Alt = Alternate
- SE = Special Exempt
- PR = Protected Ranking
- ITF = ITF entry
- JE = Junior Exempt
- w/o = Walkover
- r = Retired
- d = Defaulted
Finals
Semifinals | Final | ||||||||||||
6 | ![]() | ||||||||||||
4/WC | ![]() | w/o | |||||||||||
4/WC | ![]() | 5 | 6 | 5 | |||||||||
3 | ![]() | 7 | 2 | 7 | |||||||||
3 | ![]() | 7 | 7 | ||||||||||
7 | ![]() | 5 | 5 | ||||||||||
Top half
First Round | Second Round | Quarterfinals | Semifinals | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
LL | ![]() | 3 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() | 6 | 5 | 6 | ![]() | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||
LL | ![]() | 1 | 7 | 1 | ![]() | 5 | 65 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Q | ![]() | 2 | 1 | 6 | ![]() | 7 | 7 | ||||||||||||||||||||
WC | ![]() | 6 | 6 | WC | ![]() | 2 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Q | ![]() | 4 | 2 | 6 | ![]() | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||
6 | ![]() | 6 | 6 | 6 | ![]() | ||||||||||||||||||||||
4/WC | ![]() | w/o | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
4/WC | ![]() | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Q | ![]() | 6 | 4 | Q | ![]() | 3 | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||
![]() | 0 | 1 | r | 4/WC | ![]() | 4 | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||
![]() | 1 | 1 | ![]() | 6 | 0 | 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() | 6 | 6 | ![]() | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() | 7 | 6 | ![]() | 1 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
9 | ![]() | 5 | 3 |
Bottom half
First Round | Second Round | Quarterfinals | Semifinals | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
8 | ![]() | 4 | 6 | 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() | 6 | 3 | 7 | ![]() | 64 | 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() | 6 | 5 | 6 | ![]() | 7 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() | 2 | 7 | 2 | ![]() | 3 | 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() | 5 | 4 | 3 | ![]() | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() | 7 | 6 | ![]() | 3 | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
3 | ![]() | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
3 | ![]() | 7 | 7 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
7 | ![]() | 6 | 6 | 7 | ![]() | 5 | 5 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Q | ![]() | 1 | 1 | 7 | ![]() | 4 | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||
![]() | 0 | 7 | 6 | ![]() | 6 | 1 | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||
WC | ![]() | 6 | 65 | 3 | 7 | ![]() | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||
![]() | 66 | 6 | 1 | ![]() | 4 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() | 7 | 4 | 6 | ![]() | 6 | 3 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||
LL | ![]() | 1 | 6 | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
gollark: Look, it says there, > By design, the POST request method requests that a web server accepts the data enclosed in the body of the request message, most likely for storing it.
gollark: The urlencoded MIME type/format doesn't mean it's sent in the URL, just that it uses similar encoding to query strings.
gollark: POST data isn't in the URL though, it's sent as the body.
gollark: The reason they *do* is probably just consistency with other methods (it would be very annoying if they worked very differently to GET routing-wise) and so requests can be routed to the right handler more easily.
gollark: <@498244879894315027> Why wouldn't (shouldn't?) they have a URL?
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.