2005–06 IIHF Continental Cup
The Continental Cup 2005–06 was the ninth edition of the IIHF Continental Cup. The season started on September 23, 2005, and finished on January 9, 2006.
The tournament was won by Lada Togliatti, who led the final group.
Preliminary round
Group A
Team #1 | Score | Team #2 |
---|---|---|
KHL Medveščak Zagreb |
5:1 | |
HC Steaua București |
5:2 | |
HC Steaua București |
8:3 |
Group A standings *
Rank | Team | Points |
1 | 4 | |
---|---|---|
2 | 2 | |
3 | 0 |
*:
Group B
Team #1 | Score | Team #2 |
---|---|---|
CH Jaca |
5:2 | |
Polis Akademisi |
12:1 | |
CH Jaca |
13:2 | |
Polis Akademisi |
5:3 | |
HC Slavia Sofia |
5:0 | |
Polis Akademisi |
4:7 |
Group B standings
Rank | Team | Points |
1 | 6 | |
---|---|---|
2 | 4 | |
3 | 2 | |
4 | 0 |
First Group Stage
Group C
Team #1 | Score | Team #2 |
---|---|---|
HK Riga 2000 |
7:2 | |
SC Energija |
3:4 | |
HK Riga 2000 |
10:4 | |
SC Energija |
2:9 | |
HC Steaua București |
4:4 | |
SC Energija |
0:10 |
Group C standings
Rank | Team | Points |
1 | 6 | |
---|---|---|
2 | 3 | |
3 | 3 | |
4 | 0 |
Group D
Team #1 | Score | Team #2 |
---|---|---|
Herning Blue Fox |
2:2 | |
Brûleurs de Loups Grenoble |
2:2 | |
Coventry Blaze |
5:4 | |
Brûleurs de Loups Grenoble |
3:1 | |
Herning Blue Fox |
3:3 | |
Brûleurs de Loups Grenoble |
2:0 |
Group D standings
Rank | Team | Points |
1 | 5 | |
---|---|---|
2 | 3 | |
3 | 2 | |
4 | 2 |
Group E
Team #1 | Score | Team #2 |
---|---|---|
Sokil Kiev |
4:0 | |
Yunost Minsk |
4:0 | |
Kazzinc-Torpedo |
3:1 | |
Yunost Minsk |
8:0 | |
Kazzinc-Torpedo |
10:0 | |
Yunost Minsk |
2:1 |
Group E standings
Rank | Team | Points |
1 | 6 | |
---|---|---|
2 | 4 | |
3 | 2 | |
4 | 0 |
Second Group Stage
Group F
(Jesenice, Slovenia)
Team #1 | Score | Team #2 |
---|---|---|
HK Riga 2000 |
2:1 | |
HK Acroni Jesenice |
6:2 | |
HK Acroni Jesenice |
1:2 | |
HK Riga 2000 |
4:3 | |
Yunost Minsk |
8:1 | |
HK Acroni Jesenice |
1:2 |
Group F standings
Rank | Team | Points |
1 | 6 | |
---|---|---|
2 | 4 | |
3 | 2 | |
4 | 0 |
Final stage
Final Group
Team #1 | Score | Team #2 |
---|---|---|
Lada Togliatti |
4:1 | |
Alba Volán Székesfehérvár |
2:3 | |
HK Riga 2000 |
5:4 | |
Alba Volán Székesfehérvár |
3:4 | |
Alba Volán Székesfehérvár |
2:7 | |
Lada Togliatti |
1:0 |
Final Group standings
Rank | Team | Points |
1 | 6 | |
---|---|---|
2 | 4 | |
3 | 2 | |
4 | 0 |
gollark: Reasonably simple spec, safe parsing, no weird insanity like that, no whitespace sensitivity, still pretty human-readable like INI files.
gollark: I think TOML is generally a nice config format.
gollark: Because it doesn't use quotes, and implicit whitespace.
gollark: There is literally a website to explain the various ways YAML does multiline strings.
gollark: The YAML spec is *gigantic*, you run into problems with its weird implicit typing stuff (I think "no", which you may need as a country code or something, is a boolean, and "034" is an octal literal), most parsers default to "wildly unsafe and insecure" for some bizarre reason, and there are far too many ways to do everything.
References
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.