2004 Guangzhou International Women's Open – Doubles
Li Ting and Sun Tiantian won the first edition of this tournament in an all-Chinese final.[1][2]
Doubles | |
---|---|
2004 Guangzhou International Women's Open | |
Champions | ![]() ![]() |
Runners-up | ![]() ![]() |
Final score | 6–4, 6–1 |
Seeds
Nicole Pratt / Tamarine Tanasugarn (Quarterfinals) Li Ting / Sun Tiantian (Winners) Yan Zi / Zheng Jie (Semifinals) Gisela Dulko / María Vento-Kabchi (Quarterfinals)
Draw
Key
- Q = Qualifier
- WC = Wild Card
- LL = Lucky Loser
- Alt = Alternate
- SE = Special Exempt
- PR = Protected Ranking
- ITF = ITF entry
- JE = Junior Exempt
- w/o = Walkover
- r = Retired
- d = Defaulted
First Round | Quarterfinals | Semifinals | Final | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 0 | 1 | 1 | ![]() ![]() | 3 | 6 | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 2 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 1 | 4 | ![]() ![]() | w/o | |||||||||||||||||||||||
4 | ![]() ![]() | 4 | 6 | 6 | ![]() ![]() | ||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 6 | 4 | 1 | 4 | ![]() ![]() | ||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | ![]() ![]() | w/o | |||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 3 | 4 | ![]() ![]() | 4 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Q | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 3 | 3 | 2 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 3 | 6 | 6 | ![]() ![]() | 3 | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||
WC | ![]() ![]() | 1 | 0 | 3 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||
3 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | 3 | ![]() ![]() | 5 | 65 | ||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 2 | 6 | 3 | 2 | ![]() ![]() | 7 | 7 | ||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 6 | 3 | 6 | ![]() ![]() | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 62 | 2 | 2 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | ![]() ![]() | 7 | 6 |
gollark: Or their big database dumps, but they lack search and images.
gollark: You can use kiwix for it.
gollark: The 15GB figure is for without images. With images (probably downscaled) my copy is 80GB.
gollark: Wikipedia fits into 15GB (minus user pages etc) and it uses horrible inefficient XML.
gollark: If you drop the images and HTML formatting and whatever else most ebooks contain, and do compression better than ZIP does, you could probably reach some *ridiculous* compression ratios.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.