2004–05 Toto Cup Leumit
The 2004–05 Toto Cup Leumit was the 16th time the cup was being contested as a competition for the second tier in the Israeli football league system, and the first time since 1998–99 that the competition was contested as a separate competition.
| Season | 2004–05 |
|---|---|
| Champions | Maccabi Netanya |
← 2003–04 2005–06 → | |
The competition was won by Maccabi Netanya, who had beaten Hapoel Kfar Saba 3–2 on penalties after 1–1 in the final.
Format
The 12 Israeli Permier League clubs were split into three groups, each with 4 clubs. The two top clubs in each group, Along with the two best third-placed clubs, advanced to the quarter-finals.
Group stage
The matches were played from 6 August to 30 November 2004.
Group A
| Pos | Team | Pld | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | HJE | HTZ | IKS | HAC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hapoel Jerusalem (A) | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 | 1–0 | 4–3 | 1–2 | ||
| 2 | Hapoel Tzafririm Holon (A) | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 9 | +1 | 8 | 1–0 | 2–3 | 3–3 | ||
| 3 | Ironi Kiryat Shmona (A) | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 8 | 1–2 | 0–0 | 1–1 | ||
| 4 | Hapoel Acre | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 11 | 12 | −1 | 8 | 2–1 | 2–4 | 1–2 |
Source: Israel Toto Cup 2004/05
Rules for classification: 1st points; 2nd goal difference; 3rd matches won; 4th goals scored; 5th head-to-head; 6th decision match
(A) Advanced to quarter-finals.
Rules for classification: 1st points; 2nd goal difference; 3rd matches won; 4th goals scored; 5th head-to-head; 6th decision match
(A) Advanced to quarter-finals.
Group B
| Pos | Team | Pld | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | HRH | HKS | MHE | HRL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hapoel Ramat HaSharon (A) | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 9 | 5 | +4 | 11 | 3–3 | 1–1 | 2–0 | ||
| 2 | Hapoel Kfar Saba (A) | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 9 | 7 | +2 | 11 | 1–0 | 1–0 | 2–0 | ||
| 3 | Maccabi Herzliya (A) | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 6 | +2 | 10 | 0–2 | 4–2 | 2–0 | ||
| 4 | Hapoel Rishon LeZion | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 8 | −8 | 1 | 0–1 | 0–0 | 0–1 |
Source: Israel Toto Cup 2004/05
Rules for classification: 1st points; 2nd goal difference; 3rd matches won; 4th goals scored; 5th head-to-head; 6th decision match
(A) Advanced to quarter-finals.
Rules for classification: 1st points; 2nd goal difference; 3rd matches won; 4th goals scored; 5th head-to-head; 6th decision match
(A) Advanced to quarter-finals.
Group C
| Pos | Team | Pld | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | MNE | HRA | MAN | HMR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Maccabi Netanya (A) | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 15 | 6 | +9 | 14 | 1–1 | 4–2 | 0–0 | ||
| 2 | Hapoel Ra'anana (A) | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 9 | 10 | −1 | 8 | 0–4 | 2–0 | 3–0 | ||
| 3 | Maccabi Ahi Nazareth | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 8 | 12 | −4 | 5 | 2–3 | 2–2 | 1–1 | ||
| 4 | Hakoah Amidar Ramat Gan | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 9 | −4 | 5 | 1–3 | 3–1 | 0–1 |
Source: Israel Toto Cup 2004/05
Rules for classification: 1st points; 2nd goal difference; 3rd matches won; 4th goals scored; 5th head-to-head; 6th decision match
(A) Advanced to quarter-finals.
Rules for classification: 1st points; 2nd goal difference; 3rd matches won; 4th goals scored; 5th head-to-head; 6th decision match
(A) Advanced to quarter-finals.
Elimination Rounds
Quarter-finals
| Home Team | Score | Away Team |
|---|---|---|
| Hapoel Jerusalem | 1–2 | Maccabi Netanya |
| Hapoel Ramat HaSharon | 1–3 | Hapoel Kfar Saba |
| Hapoel Tzafririm Holon | 1–0 | Maccabi Herzliya |
| Hapoel Ra'anana | 2–1 | Ironi Kiryat Shmona |
Semi-finals
| 19 January 2005 | Hapoel Kfar Saba | 3–0 | Hapoel Ra'anana | Ness Ziona |
Weisheim  Dahan |
Report (in Hebrew) |
Stadium: Ness Ziona Stadium Attendance: 200 |
| 19 January 2005 | Maccabi Netanya | 1–0 | Hapoel Tzafririm Holon | Ness Ziona |
| Abdul Aziz |
Report (in Hebrew) |
Stadium: Ness Ziona Stadium Attendance: 200 |
Final
| Hapoel Kfar Saba | 1–1 (a.e.t.) | Maccabi Netanya |
|---|---|---|
| Silva |
Report (in Hebrew) |
Abdul Aziz |
| Penalties | ||
| 2–3 | ||
gollark: Well, yes, but uncool?
gollark: It can definitely do infinite loops, but weirdly enough it looks like it doesn't have a way to push to arrays?
gollark: Can we prove Turing completeness?
gollark: It's some sort of horrible BASIC-type language encoded in YAML for defining "workflows".
gollark: https://cloud.google.com/workflows/docs/reference/syntax - Google invented an esolang.
External links
- Israel Toto Cup 2004/05 (in Hebrew)
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.