2000–01 Toto Cup Artzit

The 2000–01 Toto Cup Artzit was the 2nd time the cup was being contested as a competition for the third tier in the Israeli football league system.

Toto Cup Artzit
Season2000–01
ChampionsMaccabi Kafr Kanna

The competition was won by Maccabi Kafr Kanna, who had beaten Maccabi Ashkelon 2–0 in the final.

Format change

For this season, the 12 Liga Artzit clubs were divided into three groups with four clubs in each group. The three group winners, together with the best runner-up advanced to the semi-finals.

Group stage

Group A

Pos Team Pld W D L GF GA GD Pts HAS HTY HBY BST
1 Hapoel Ashkelon (A) 6 3 3 0 11 4 +7 12 1–1 0–0 3–0
2 Hapoel Tayibe 6 2 3 1 12 10 +2 9 1–3 2–2 3–1
3 Hapoel Bat Yam 6 1 4 1 8 9 1 7 1–3 2–2 1–1
4 Beitar Shimshon Tel Aviv 6 0 2 4 5 13 8 2 1–1 1–3 1–2
Source: RSSSF (in Hebrew)
Rules for classification: 1st points; 2nd goal difference; 3rd matches won; 4th goals scored; 5th head-to-head; 6th decision match
(A) Advanced to the Semifinals.

Group B

Pos Team Pld W D L GF GA GD Pts HRA MKK HRH HMJ
1 Hapoel Ra'anana (A) 6 4 2 0 6 1 +5 14 1–1 2–0 1–0
2 Maccabi Kafr Kanna (A) 6 3 1 2 9 4 +5 10 0–1 4–0 1–0
3 Hapoel Ramat HaSharon 6 1 2 3 3 10 7 5 0–0 1–0 1–1
4 Ihud Bnei Majd al-Krum 6 1 1 4 5 8 3 4 0–1 1–3 3–1
Source: RSSSF (in Hebrew)
Rules for classification: 1st points; 2nd goal difference; 3rd matches won; 4th goals scored; 5th head-to-head; 6th decision match
(A) Advanced to the Semifinals.

Group C

Pos Team Pld W D L GF GA GD Pts MAS MSH HAC HNI
1 Maccabi Ashkelon (A) 6 4 2 0 10 4 +6 14 1–1 2–0 1–1
2 Maccabi Sha'arayim 6 1 4 1 7 6 +1 7 1–3 3–0 1–1
3 Hapoel Acre 6 2 1 3 2 6 4 7 0–1 0–0 1–0
4 Hapoel Nazareth Illit 6 0 3 3 4 7 3 3 1–2 1–1 0–1
Source: RSSSF (in Hebrew)
Rules for classification: 1st points; 2nd goal difference; 3rd matches won; 4th goals scored; 5th head-to-head; 6th decision match
(A) Advanced to the Semifinals.

Semifinals

Home Team Score Away Team
Hapoel Ashkelon 3–3 (a.e.t.) (4–5 p) Maccabi Ashkelon
Hapoel Ra'anana 1–4 Maccabi Kafr Kanna

Final

Maccabi Ashkelon0–2Maccabi Kafr Kanna
Abbas  46'
El-Al  80'
gollark: Oh hypermemetic bee tesseracts.
gollark: Thusly, ECPP/APR/PSW one?
gollark: > While the algorithm is of immense theoretical importance, it is not used in practice, rendering it a galactic algorithm. For 64-bit inputs, the Baillie–PSW primality test is deterministic and runs many orders of magnitude faster. For larger inputs, the performance of the (also unconditionally correct) ECPP and APR tests is far superior to AKS. Additionally, ECPP can output a primality certificate that allows independent and rapid verification of the results, which is not possible with the AKS algorithm.
gollark: I mean, it's probably true, right?
gollark: Assume the Riemann hypothesis and use the miller test?

References

    See also

    This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.