2004–05 Scottish Third Division
The 2004–05 Scottish Third Division was won by Gretna who, along with Peterhead, gained promotion to the Second Division. East Stirlingshire finished bottom.
Location of teams in 2004–05 Scottish Third Division
| Season | 2004–05 |
|---|---|
| Champions | Gretna |
| Promoted | Gretna Peterhead |
← 2003–04 2005–06 → | |
Table
| Pos | Team | Pld | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Promotion or relegation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gretna | 36 | 32 | 2 | 2 | 130 | 29 | +101 | 98 | Promoted to Second Division 2005–06 |
| 2 | Peterhead | 36 | 23 | 9 | 4 | 81 | 38 | +43 | 78 | |
| 3 | Cowdenbeath | 36 | 14 | 9 | 13 | 54 | 61 | −7 | 51 | |
| 4 | Queen's Park | 36 | 13 | 9 | 14 | 51 | 50 | +1 | 48 | |
| 5 | Montrose | 36 | 13 | 7 | 16 | 47 | 53 | −6 | 46 | |
| 6 | Elgin City | 36 | 12 | 7 | 17 | 39 | 61 | −22 | 43 | |
| 7 | Stenhousemuir | 36 | 10 | 12 | 14 | 58 | 58 | 0 | 42 | |
| 8 | East Fife | 36 | 10 | 8 | 18 | 40 | 56 | −16 | 38 | |
| 9 | Albion Rovers | 36 | 8 | 10 | 18 | 40 | 78 | −38 | 34 | |
| 10 | East Stirlingshire | 36 | 5 | 7 | 24 | 32 | 88 | −56 | 22 |
Source:
Top scorers
| Rank | Scorer | Goals | Team |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  |
38 | Gretna |
| 2 | |
27 | Gretna |
| 3 | |
21 | Peterhead |
| 4 | |
18 | Stenhousemuir |
| 5 | |
14 | Montrose |
|
Queen's Park | ||
| 7 | |
13 | Peterhead |
| 8 |  |
12 | Gretna |
|
Cowdenbeath | ||
| 10 | |
9 | Stenhousemuir |
|
East Fife | ||
|
Elgin City |
Attendance
The average attendance for Scottish Third Division clubs for the 2004/05 season are shown below:
| Team | Average |
|---|---|
| Gretna | 895 |
| East Fife | 663 |
| Peterhead | 640 |
| Queen's Park | 593 |
| Elgin City | 455 |
| Stenhousemuir | 432 |
| Montrose | 390 |
| Albion Rovers | 322 |
| East Stirlingshire | 293 |
| Cowdenbeath | 262 |
gollark: Although I don't know why it's "mov" when it's literally "copy".
gollark: Yes, all is to be encoded as turing-complete move operations and page faults.
gollark: You want to make it so that you don't do too much work, regular users aren't inconvenienced much, and on the fence people will find it easier to get it officially than pirate.
gollark: Make a mildly irritating to get around but simple system which won't get in the way probably maybe?
gollark: Oh, and also having to contact you if you switch computers is ridiculously awful.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.