2003 Moorilla Hobart International – Doubles

Doubles
	2003 Moorilla Hobart International
Champion	Cara Black; Elena Likhovtseva
Runner-up	Barbara Schett; Patricia Wartusch
Final score	7-5, 7-6(7-1)

Tathiana Garbin and Rita Grande were the defending champions. Garbin did not participate, whilst Grande partnered Emmanuelle Gagliardi, losing in the first round.

The title was won by Cara Black and Elena Likhovtseva who defeated Barbara Schett and Patricia Wartusch in straight sets in the final.

Seeds

Cara Black / Elena Likhovtseva (Champions)
Barbara Schett / Patricia Wartusch (Final)
Els Callens / Åsa Svensson (Semifinals)
Petra Mandula / Barbara Rittner (Semifinals)

Draw

Key

Draw

1st round					2nd round					Semifinals					Finals

1	C Black E Likhovtseva	6	6
	K Freye A Roesch	2	0		1	C Black E Likhovtseva	6	6
	I Benešová H Nagyová	3	5			N de Villiers A Jidkova	2	4
	N de Villiers A Jidkova	6	7							1	C Black E Likhovtseva	6	6
4	P Mandula B Rittner	4	7	6						4	P Mandula B Rittner	3	0
	A Molik R Neffa de los Ríos	6	6³	2	4	P Mandula B Rittner	6	6
Q	M Díaz Oliva V Zvonareva	4	4			M Marrero A Serra Zanetti	3	2
	M Marrero A Serra Zanetti	6	6												1	C Black E Likhovtseva	7	7
	A Frazier E Schmidt	4	6	7											2	B Schett P Wartusch	5	6¹
	E Gagliardi R Grande	6	0	6⁷		A Frazier E Schmidt	6	5	1
	MJ Martínez A Medina Garrigues	2	4		3	E Callens Å Svensson	4	7	6
3	E Callens Å Svensson	6	6							3	E Callens Å Svensson	2	6	3
	A Augustus A Spears	6	6							2	B Schett P Wartusch	6	3	6
	B Schwartz J Wöhr	4	2			A Augustus A Spears	1	6²
WC	K Grant D Roberts	6	5	1	2	B Schett P Wartusch	6	7
2	B Schett P Wartusch	3	7	6

Qualifying

Seeds

Alona Bondarenko / Valeria Bondarenko (Qualifying competition)
Mariana Díaz Oliva / Vera Zvonareva (Qualified)

Qualifiers

Mariana Díaz Oliva / Vera Zvonareva

Draw

First Round			Qualifying Competition


			1	A Bondarenko V Bondarenko	7
	J Craybas S Taylor	4	2	M Díaz Oliva V Zvonareva	9
2	M Díaz Oliva V Zvonareva	8

gollark: `lsusb`

gollark: Does it appear as a USB device whatsoever?

gollark: Why does Wikipedia not just have an option to intersect arbitrary lists?

gollark: > Some may argue that the CDC originally claimed that masks were ineffective as a way to retain the already-small supply of masks for healthcare providers and medical officials. Others may argue that the CDC made this claim due to ever-developing research around the virus. I am arguing, however, that the CDC made the claim that masks are ineffective because the CDC’s sole purpose is to provide scientific legitimation of the U.S. as a eugenicist project through medical genocide. As outlined in this essay, the CDC has a history of releasing deadly information and later backtracking on it when the damage has already been done.

gollark: > Choosing to tell the public that supplies that could benefit everyone is ineffective, rather than calling for more supplies to be created—in the midst of a global pandemic, no less—is eugenics. Making the conscious decision to tell the general public that something is ineffective when you have not done all of the necessary research, especially when medical officials are using the very same equipment, is medical and scientific genocide.

References

Draw

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.