2003 BMW Open – Singles

Younes El Aynaoui was the defending champion but did not compete that year.

Singles
2003 BMW Open
Champion Roger Federer
Runner-up Jarkko Nieminen
Final score6–1, 6–4
Draw32 (4Q / 3WC)
Seeds8

Roger Federer won in the final 6–1, 6–4 against Jarkko Nieminen.

Seeds
  1. Roger Federer (Champion)
  2. Paradorn Srichaphan (Second Round)
  3. Sjeng Schalken (Quarterfinals)
  4. Rainer Schüttler (Quarterfinals)
  5. Yevgeny Kafelnikov (Semifinals, retired because of a neck injury)
  6. Mikhail Youzhny (Quarterfinals)
  7. Tim Henman (Second Round)
  8. Jarkko Nieminen (Final)

Draw

Key

Finals
Semifinals Final
          
1 Roger Federer 6 6
  Stefan Koubek 2 1
1 Roger Federer 6 6
8 Jarkko Nieminen 1 4
5 Yevgeny Kafelnikov 4 1r
8 Jarkko Nieminen 6 0

Top Half
First Round Second Round Quarterfinals Semifinals
1 R Federer 6 6  
  Ž Krajan 4 3   1 R Federer 6 6  
  R Sluiter 7 6     R Sluiter 4 3  
Q R Furlan 5 4   1 R Federer 6 6  
Q H Levy 6 6   6 M Youzhny 2 3  
  K Carlsen 3 1   Q H Levy 6 4 1
Q J F Andersen 6 5 3 6 M Youzhny 3 6 6
6 M Youzhny 4 7 6 1 R Federer 6 6  
4 R Schüttler 6 6     S Koubek 2 1  
  J Melzer 4 3   4 R Schüttler 4 6 6
  N Davydenko 7 6     N Davydenko 6 2 3
  C Mamiit 5 1   4 R Schüttler 3 4  
  S Koubek 7 6     S Koubek 6 6  
WC B Phau 5 4     S Koubek 6 6  
  N Lapentti 5 6 1 WC/7 T Henman 4 0  
WC/7 T Henman 7 4 6

Bottom Half
First Round Second Round Quarterfinals Semifinals
5 Y Kafelnikov 6 6  
  O Rochus 3 2   5 Y Kafelnikov 7 4 6
  A Voinea 5 62     A Waske 5 6 3
  A Waske 7 77   5 Y Kafelnikov 62 7 6
  T Behrend 64 5   3 S Schalken 77 5 3
  W Arthurs 77 7     W Arthurs 64 3  
  L Burgsmüller 3 1   3 S Schalken 77 6  
3 S Schalken 6 6   5 Y Kafelnikov 4 1r
8 J Nieminen 6 6   8 J Nieminen 6 0  
  I Labadze 2 3   8 J Nieminen 6 6  
  J-R Lisnard 6 6     J-R Lisnard 3 0  
Q M Verkerk 2 4   8 J Nieminen 6 6  
  O Mutis 3 2     R Štěpánek 1 1  
  R Štěpánek 6 6     R Štěpánek 6 6  
WC M Kohlmann 4 1   2 P Srichaphan 3 2  
2 P Srichaphan 6 6  
gollark: Rewrite that as e^(some function of x), apply chain rule.
gollark: What do you mean? As in, if it involves 1/x or something like this? That's what the chain rule is for.
gollark: This can also be written as a function of x explicitly if you want (it is one implicitly).
gollark: It's the same. If you say "y = whatever (in terms of x), dy/dx = derivative of whatever (in terms of x)", this is equivalent to saying "f(x) = whatever (still in terms of x), f'(x) = derivative of whatever (in terms of x)".
gollark: Consider what is done to the x to attain your output of e^(x ln a).
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.