2002 Ordina Open – Men's Doubles

Paul Haarhuis and Sjeng Schalken were the defending champions but they competed with different partners that year, Haarhuis with Brian MacPhie and Schalken with Julien Boutter.

Men's Doubles
2002 Ordina Open
2001 Champions Paul Haarhuis
Sjeng Schalken
Champions Martin Damm
Cyril Suk
Runners-up Paul Haarhuis
Brian MacPhie
Final score7–6(8–6), 6–7(6–8), 6–4

Boutter and Schalken lost in the first round to Gastón Etlis and Martín García.

Haarhuis and MacPhie lost in the final 7–6(8–6), 6–7(6–8), 6–4 against Martin Damm and Cyril Suk.

Seeds

Champion seeds are indicated in bold text while text in italics indicates the round in which those seeds were eliminated.

  1. Martin Damm / Cyril Suk (Champions)
  2. Paul Haarhuis / Brian MacPhie (Final)
  3. Julien Boutter / Sjeng Schalken (First Round)
  4. Michael Hill / Daniel Vacek (First Round)

Draw

Key
First Round Quarterfinals Semifinals Final
1 M Damm
C Suk 		6 6  
WC M Chang
J van Lottum 		4 4   1 M Damm
C Suk 		6 6  
  M Rodríguez
T Vanhoudt 		7 5 4   A Calleri
G Cañas 		1 4  
  A Calleri
G Cañas 		5 7 6 1 M Damm
C Suk 		66 77 7
3 J Boutter
S Schalken 		4 3     T Cibulec
L Friedl 		78 63 5
  G Etlis
M García 		6 6     G Etlis
M García 		4 6 610
  T Cibulec
L Friedl 		78 6     T Cibulec
L Friedl 		6 2 712
  A Clément
N Escudé 		66 3   1 Martin Damm
Cyril Suk 		78 66 6
  D Adams
A Olhovskiy 		6 6   2 Paul Haarhuis
Brian MacPhie 		66 78 4
WC S Groen
R Sluiter 		1 3     D Adams
A Olhovskiy 		6 7  
WC M Koning
B van der Valk 		68 6 77 WC M Koning
B van der Valk 		3 5  
4 M Hill
D Vacek 		710 2 65   D Adams
A Olhovskiy 		62 6 62
  T Robredo
M Youzhny 		3 6 4 2 P Haarhuis
B MacPhie 		77 4 77
  K Braasch
M Kohlmann 		6 4 6   K Braasch
M Kohlmann 		710 2 4
  P Pála
P Vízner 		62 62   2 P Haarhuis
B MacPhie 		68 6 6
2 P Haarhuis
B MacPhie 		77 77  
gollark: If it wasn't for the awful error handling, general attitude of distrust of the programmer, lol no generics, poor type system, bad dependency management, beelike syntax, channels, and claims of "simplicity", I might actually use Go, even!
gollark: Go has *some* things going for it, like the moderately fast compiler and extensive libraries.
gollark: Why would they not know about bee documentation book #35636?
gollark: I mean, you can have a system without... any optional dependency, yes.
gollark: Useful!
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.